Cancer Screening Among Adults With and Without Serious Mental Illness: A Mixed Methods Study. Issue 4 (April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Murphy, Karly A.; Stone, Elizabeth M.; Presskreischer, Rachel; McGinty, Emma E.; Daumit, Gail L.; Pollack, Craig E.
• Is Part Of: Medical care. Volume 59:Issue 4(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-04
• Subjects: serious mental illness -- cancer screening -- prevention primary care -- mixed methods -- health disparities; Economics, Medical -- Periodicals; Insurance, Health -- Periodicals; Santé, Services de -- Administration -- Périodiques; Soins médicaux -- Périodiques; Medical economics -- Periodicals; Health insurance -- Periodicals; Medical economics -- United States -- Periodicals; Health insurance -- United States -- Periodicals; Comprehensive Health Care -- Periodicals; Personal Health Services -- Periodicals; Gezondheidszorg; Économie de la santé -- Périodiques; Santé, Services de -- Périodiques; Health insurance; Medical economics; United States; Periodicals; 362.10973
• DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001499
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7079

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Persons with serious mental illness (SMI) die 10–20 years earlier than the general population; cancer is the second leading cause of death. Differences in cancer screening between SMI and the general population are not well understood. Objectives: To describe receipt of cancer screening among individuals with versus without SMI and to explore clinicians' perceptions around cancer screening for people with SMI. Methods: Mixed-methods study using 2010–2017 MarketScan commercial insurance administrative claims data and semi-structured clinician interviews. In the quantitative analyses, we used multivariate logistic regression analyses to calculate the likelihood of receiving cervical, breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer screening among people with versus without SMI, defined as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 primary care physicians and 15 psychiatrists. Interview transcripts were coded using a hybrid deductive/inductive approach. Results: Relative to those without SMI, individuals with SMI were less likely to receive screening for cervical cancer [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80–0.81], breast cancer (aOR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.78–0.80), colorectal cancer (aOR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.89–0.91), and prostate cancer (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.84–0.87). Clinicians identified 5 themes that may help explain the lower rates of cancer screening in persons with SMI: access to care, available support, prioritization of other issues, communication, and patient concerns. Conclusions: People with SMI were less likely to receive 4 common types of cancer screening. Improving cancer screening rates in the SMI population will likely require a multidisciplinary approach to overcome barriers to screening. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.