Breeding Top Genotypes and Accelerating Response to Recurrent Selection by Selecting Parents with Greater Gametic Variance. Issue 1 (1st January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bijma, Piter; Wientjes, Yvonne C J; Calus, Mario P L
• Is Part Of: Genetics. Volume 214:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 91
• Page End: 107
• Publication Date: 2020-01-01
• Subjects: Mendelian sampling -- GEBV -- genomic selection -- response to selection -- virtual gametes -- gametic breeding value -- within-family variation -- usefulness criterion; Genetics -- Periodicals; 576.5
• DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302643
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-6731

Abstract

Abstract: Because of variation in linkage phase and heterozygosity among individuals, some individuals produce genetically more variable gametes than others. With the availability of genomic EBVs (GEBVs) or estimates of SNP-effects together with phased genotypes, differences in gametic variability can be quantified by simulating a set of virtual gametes of each selection candidate. Previous results in dairy cattle show that gametic variance can be large. Here, we show that breeders can increase the probability of breeding a top-ranking genotype and response to recurrent selection by selecting parents that produce more variable gametes, using the index I = G E B V + 2 x p S D g G E B V, where x p is the standardized normal truncation point belonging to selected proportion p, and SDgGEBV is the SD of the GEBV of an individual's gametes. Benefits of the index were considerably larger in an ongoing selection program with equilibrium genetic parameters than in an initially unselected population. Superiority of the index over selection on GEBV increased strongly with the magnitude of the S D g G E B V, indicating that benefits of the index may vary considerably among populations. Compared to selection on ordinary GEBV, the probability of breeding a top-ranking individual can be increased by ∼36%, and response to selection by ∼3.6% when selection is strong ( P = 0.001) based on values for the Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle population. Two-stage selection, with a preselection on GEBV and a final selection on the index, considerably reduced computational requirements with little loss of benefits. Response to multiple generations of selection and inheritance of the SDgEBV require further study.