Open-label randomised pragmatic trial (CONTACT) comparing naproxen and low-dose colchicine for the treatment of gout flares in primary care. Issue 2 (30th October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Open-label randomised pragmatic trial (CONTACT) comparing naproxen and low-dose colchicine for the treatment of gout flares in primary care. Issue 2 (30th October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Open-label randomised pragmatic trial (CONTACT) comparing naproxen and low-dose colchicine for the treatment of gout flares in primary care
- Authors:
- Roddy, Edward
Clarkson, Kris
Blagojevic-Bucknall, Milica
Mehta, Rajnikant
Oppong, Raymond
Avery, Anthony
Hay, Elaine M
Heneghan, Carl
Hartshorne, Liz
Hooper, Julie
Hughes, Gemma
Jowett, Sue
Lewis, Martyn
Little, Paul
McCartney, Karen
Mahtani, Kamal R
Nunan, David
Santer, Miriam
Williams, Sam
Mallen, Christian D - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: To compare the effectiveness and safety of naproxen and low-dose colchicine for treating gout flares in primary care. Methods: This was a multicentre open-label randomised trial. Adults with a gout flare recruited from 100 general practices were randomised equally to naproxen 750 mg immediately then 250 mg every 8 hours for 7 days or low-dose colchicine 500 mcg three times per day for 4 days. The primary outcome was change in worst pain intensity in the last 24 hours (0–10 Numeric Rating Scale) from baseline measured daily over the first 7 days: mean change from baseline was compared between groups over days 1–7 by intention to treat. Results: Between 29 January 2014 and 31 December 2015, we recruited 399 participants (naproxen n=200, colchicine n=199), of whom 349 (87.5%) completed primary outcome data at day 7. There was no significant between-group difference in average pain-change scores over days 1–7 (colchicine vs naproxen: mean difference −0.18; 95% CI −0.53 to 0.17; p=0.32). During days 1–7, diarrhoea (45.9% vs 20.0%; OR 3.31; 2.01 to 5.44) and headache (20.5% vs 10.7%; 1.92; 1.03 to 3.55) were more common in the colchicine group than the naproxen group but constipation was less common (4.8% vs 19.3%; 0.24; 0.11 to 0.54). Conclusion: We found no difference in pain intensity over 7 days between people with a gout flare randomised to either naproxen or low-dose colchicine. Naproxen caused fewer side effects supporting naproxen as first-lineAbstract : Objectives: To compare the effectiveness and safety of naproxen and low-dose colchicine for treating gout flares in primary care. Methods: This was a multicentre open-label randomised trial. Adults with a gout flare recruited from 100 general practices were randomised equally to naproxen 750 mg immediately then 250 mg every 8 hours for 7 days or low-dose colchicine 500 mcg three times per day for 4 days. The primary outcome was change in worst pain intensity in the last 24 hours (0–10 Numeric Rating Scale) from baseline measured daily over the first 7 days: mean change from baseline was compared between groups over days 1–7 by intention to treat. Results: Between 29 January 2014 and 31 December 2015, we recruited 399 participants (naproxen n=200, colchicine n=199), of whom 349 (87.5%) completed primary outcome data at day 7. There was no significant between-group difference in average pain-change scores over days 1–7 (colchicine vs naproxen: mean difference −0.18; 95% CI −0.53 to 0.17; p=0.32). During days 1–7, diarrhoea (45.9% vs 20.0%; OR 3.31; 2.01 to 5.44) and headache (20.5% vs 10.7%; 1.92; 1.03 to 3.55) were more common in the colchicine group than the naproxen group but constipation was less common (4.8% vs 19.3%; 0.24; 0.11 to 0.54). Conclusion: We found no difference in pain intensity over 7 days between people with a gout flare randomised to either naproxen or low-dose colchicine. Naproxen caused fewer side effects supporting naproxen as first-line treatment for gout flares in primary care in the absence of contraindications. Trial registration number: ISRCTN (69836939), clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01994226 ), EudraCT (2013-001354-95). … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 79:Issue 2(2020)
- Journal:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 79:Issue 2(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 79, Issue 2 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 79
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0079-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 276
- Page End:
- 284
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-30
- Subjects:
- gout -- primary care -- naproxen -- colchicine -- randomised trial
Rheumatism -- Periodicals
616.723005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ard.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=149&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/server3/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&D=ovft&PAGE=titles&SEARCH=annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases.tj&NEWS=N ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216154 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4967
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25548.xml