Intra-fractional per-beam adaptive workflow to mitigate the need for a rotating gantry during MRI-guided proton therapy. (6th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Guerreiro, F; Svensson, S; Seravalli, E; Traneus, E; Raaymakers, B W
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 66:Number 18(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-09-06
• Subjects: MRI-guided proton therapy -- intra-fractional per-beam adaptation -- adaptive planning -- patient rotation -- RayStation -- pediatric abdominal tumors; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac176f
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: The integration of real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance and proton therapy would potentially improve the proton dose steering capability by reducing daily uncertainties due to anatomical variations. The use of a fixed beamline coupled with an axial patient couch rotation would greatly simplify the proton delivery with MRI guidance. Nonetheless, it is mandatory to assure that the plan quality is not deteriorated by the anatomical deformations due to patient rotation. In this work, an in-house tool allowing for intra-fractional per-beam adaptation of intensity-modulated proton plans (BeamAdapt) was implemented through features available in RayStation. A set of three MRIs was acquired for two healthy volunteers ( V 1, V 2 ): (1) no rotation/static, (2) rotation to the right and (3) left. V 1 was rotated by 15°, to simulate a clinical pediatric abdominal case and V 2 by 45°, to simulate an extreme patient rotation case. For each volunteer, a total of four intensity-modulated pencil beam scanning plans were optimized on the static MRI using virtual abdominal targets and two-three posterior-oblique beams. Beam angles were defined according to the angulations on the rotated MRIs. With BeamAdapt, each original plan was initially converted into separate plans with one beam per plan. In an iterative order, individual beam doses were non-rigidly deformed to the rotated anatomies and re-optimized accounting for the consequent deformations and the beam doses delivered so far. For evaluation, the final accumulated dose distribution was propagated back to the static MRI. Planned and adapted dose distributions were compared by computing relative differences between dose-volume histogram metrics. Absolute target dose differences were on average below 1% and organs-at-risk mean dose differences were below 3%. With BeamAdapt, not only intra-fractional per-beam proton plan adaptation coupled with axial patient rotation is possible but also the need for a rotating gantry during MRI guidance might be mitigated.