Pooling robustness in distance sampling: Avoiding bias when there is unmodelled heterogeneity. Issue 1 (6th January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rexstad, Eric; Buckland, Steve; Marshall, Laura; Borchers, David
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 13:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2023-01-06
• Subjects: abundance estimation -- detectability -- distance sampling -- heterogeneity -- pooling robustness; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9684
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

Abstract: The pooling robustness property of distance sampling results in unbiased abundance estimation even when sources of variation in detection probability are not modeled. However, this property cannot be relied upon to produce unbiased subpopulation abundance estimates when using a single pooled detection function that ignores subpopulations. We investigate by simulation the effect of differences in subpopulation detectability upon bias in subpopulation abundance estimates. We contrast subpopulation abundance estimates using a pooled detection function with estimates derived using a detection function model employing a subpopulation covariate. Using point transect survey data from a multispecies songbird study, species‐specific abundance estimates are compared using pooled detection functions with and without a small number of adjustment terms, and a detection function with species as a covariate. With simulation, we demonstrate the bias of subpopulation abundance estimates when a pooled detection function is employed. The magnitude of the bias is positively related to the magnitude of disparity between the subpopulation detection functions. However, the abundance estimate for the entire population remains unbiased except when there is extreme heterogeneity in detection functions. Inclusion of a detection function model with a subpopulation covariate essentially removes the bias of the subpopulation abundance estimates. The analysis of the songbird point count surveys shows some bias in species‐specific abundance estimates when a pooled detection function is used. Pooling robustness is a unique property of distance sampling, producing unbiased abundance estimates at the level of the study area even in the presence of large differences in detectability between subpopulations. In situations where subpopulation abundance estimates are required for data‐poor subpopulations and where the subpopulations can be identified, we recommend the use of subpopulation as a covariate to reduce bias induced in subpopulation abundance estimates. Abstract : Pooling robustness is a unique property of distance sampling. This article demonstrates this property in a simulated scenario with extreme amounts of heterogeneity in detection probability between subpopulations. The article also demonstrates the bias in abundance estimates when estimating subpopulation‐specific abundance using a detection function estimated from data combined across subpopulations.