Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis. Issue 3 (17th October 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis. Issue 3 (17th October 2022)
- Main Title:
- Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis
- Authors:
- Rebsamen, Michael
McKinley, Richard
Radojewski, Piotr
Pistor, Maximilian
Friedli, Christoph
Hoepner, Robert
Salmen, Anke
Chan, Andrew
Reyes, Mauricio
Wagner, Franca
Wiest, Roland
Rummel, Christian - Abstract:
- Abstract: Brain morphometry is usually based on non‐enhanced (pre‐contrast) T1‐weighted MRI. However, such dedicated protocols are sometimes missing in clinical examinations. Instead, an image with a contrast agent is often available. Existing tools such as FreeSurfer yield unreliable results when applied to contrast‐enhanced (CE) images. Consequently, these acquisitions are excluded from retrospective morphometry studies, which reduces the sample size. We hypothesize that deep learning (DL)‐based morphometry methods can extract morphometric measures also from contrast‐enhanced MRI. We have extended DL+DiReCT to cope with contrast‐enhanced MRI. Training data for our DL‐based model were enriched with non‐enhanced and CE image pairs from the same session. The segmentations were derived with FreeSurfer from the non‐enhanced image and used as ground truth for the coregistered CE image. A longitudinal dataset of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), comprising relapsing remitting (RRMS) and primary progressive (PPMS) subgroups, was used for the evaluation. Global and regional cortical thickness derived from non‐enhanced and CE images were contrasted to results from FreeSurfer. Correlation coefficients of global mean cortical thickness between non‐enhanced and CE images were significantly larger with DL+DiReCT ( r = 0.92) than with FreeSurfer ( r = 0.75). When comparing the longitudinal atrophy rates between the two MS subgroups, the effect sizes between PPMS and RRMS wereAbstract: Brain morphometry is usually based on non‐enhanced (pre‐contrast) T1‐weighted MRI. However, such dedicated protocols are sometimes missing in clinical examinations. Instead, an image with a contrast agent is often available. Existing tools such as FreeSurfer yield unreliable results when applied to contrast‐enhanced (CE) images. Consequently, these acquisitions are excluded from retrospective morphometry studies, which reduces the sample size. We hypothesize that deep learning (DL)‐based morphometry methods can extract morphometric measures also from contrast‐enhanced MRI. We have extended DL+DiReCT to cope with contrast‐enhanced MRI. Training data for our DL‐based model were enriched with non‐enhanced and CE image pairs from the same session. The segmentations were derived with FreeSurfer from the non‐enhanced image and used as ground truth for the coregistered CE image. A longitudinal dataset of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), comprising relapsing remitting (RRMS) and primary progressive (PPMS) subgroups, was used for the evaluation. Global and regional cortical thickness derived from non‐enhanced and CE images were contrasted to results from FreeSurfer. Correlation coefficients of global mean cortical thickness between non‐enhanced and CE images were significantly larger with DL+DiReCT ( r = 0.92) than with FreeSurfer ( r = 0.75). When comparing the longitudinal atrophy rates between the two MS subgroups, the effect sizes between PPMS and RRMS were higher with DL+DiReCT both for non‐enhanced ( d = −0.304) and CE images ( d = −0.169) than for FreeSurfer (non‐enhanced d = −0.111, CE d = 0.085). In conclusion, brain morphometry can be derived reliably from contrast‐enhanced MRI using DL‐based morphometry tools, making additional cases available for analysis and potential future diagnostic morphometry tools. Abstract : Brain morphometry can be derived reliably from contrast‐enhanced MRI using DL+DiReCT, a deep learning‐based morphometry tool. Making MR images acquired for clinical examinations with a contrast agent accessible for quantitative analysis is of interest for retrospective studies and potential future diagnostic support tools. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Human brain mapping. Volume 44:Issue 3(2023)
- Journal:
- Human brain mapping
- Issue:
- Volume 44:Issue 3(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 44, Issue 3 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0044-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 970
- Page End:
- 979
- Publication Date:
- 2022-10-17
- Subjects:
- brain morphometry -- cortical thickness -- deep learning -- MRI -- post‐contrast imaging
Brain mapping -- Periodicals
611.81 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/hbm.26117 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1065-9471
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4336.031000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25526.xml