A Robin Hood for all: a conjoint experiment on support for basic income. Issue 2 (1st February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rincon, Leire
• Is Part Of: Journal of European public policy. Volume 30:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 375
• Page End: 399
• Publication Date: 2023-02-01
• Subjects: Universal basic income -- preferences -- conjoint experiment -- universality; European Union countries -- Politics and government -- Periodicals; Political planning -- European Union countries -- Periodicals; Politique publique -- Pays de l'Union européenne -- Périodiques; Pays de l'Union européenne -- Politique et gouvernement -- Périodiques; 361.61094
• DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2021.2007983
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1350-1763

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Support for universal basic income is one of the key conundrums of the politics of welfare reform. Research shows that the predictors of UBI favourability also explain support for other policy alternatives, which differ substantially from a UBI, like targeted or conditional cash transfers. What is attractive or objectionable about a UBI to individuals, and which policy alternatives does public opinion actually prefer? In this paper, I tackle these questions with a conjoint experiment conducted in Spain. The results show that the universality of UBI, i.e., the fact that it is given to everyone, is what generates opposition. On the other hand, its unconditionality or the idea that it does not attach any conditions to recipients, is not particularly unpopular. However, the results also reveal that progressive funding mechanisms and restricting eligibility criteria to citizens only, can boost approval for this policy. These results have far-reaching implications for the study of welfare preferences, UBI support and theories on deservingness.