Change in QRS area by cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with clinical outcomes and echocardiographic response. (25th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ghossein, M.A; Van Stipdonk, A.M.W; Plesinger, F; Kloosterman, M; Salden, O.A.E; Wouters, P; Meine, M; Maass, A.H; Prinzen, F.W; Vernooy, K
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 41:(2020)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2020-11-25
• Subjects: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0814
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is the cornerstone of treatment in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure. Recently, baseline QRS area proved to predict outcomes after CRT better than QRS duration and morphology. Purpose: It was the aim of the study to investigate whether the change in QRS area (ΔQRS area) by CRT-pacing further improves the prediction of CRT outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on 1, 299 patients, who were included in a CRT-registry from three Dutch University hospitals with both pre- (baseline) and post-implantation 12-lead ECGs. ΔQRS area and ΔQRS duration were defined as the decrease in their respective values after CRT. Optimal cut offs for ΔQRS area and ΔQRS duration by means of Youden indices were found at 62μVs and −11ms, respectively. Primary endpoint was a combination of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, and left ventricular assist device implantation. Secondary endpoint was the relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and echocardiographic response being defined as ≥15% LVESV reduction. Results: The primary endpoint occurred in 408 patients (31%). ΔQRS area was superior to ΔQRS duration for the primary and secondary endpoints. Primary endpoint analysis showed a lower risk in the ΔQRS area ≥62μVs than in the <62μVs group (HR 0.43; 0.33–0.56, p<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, both baseline QRS area and ΔQRS area remained significantly associated with both primary and secondary endpoints. Clinical outcome (left panel of figure) and echocardiographic response (right panel) were significantly worse in patients with baseline QRS area <109μVs (group 3) than in those with QRS area ≥109μVs. Within the latter group, outcomes were significantly better in patients with ΔQRS area ≥62μVs (group 1) as compared to ΔQRS area <62μVs (group 2) (figure). Baseline QRS duration and ΔQRS duration were not independently associated with both clinical outcome and echocardiographic response. Conclusion: The combination of baseline QRS area and ΔQRS area has a stronger association with CRT response than baseline QRS area alone, and (Δ)QRS duration. These results suggest that especially in patients with a good electrical substrate (large baseline QRS area) it is worthwhile to adjust CRT to achieve the largest decrease in QRS area. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding source: None