Comparison of pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary artery compliance during exercise between IPAH and CTEPH with normal pulmonary artery pressure. (25th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nakata, C; Takeuchi, K; Kikuchi, H; Goda, A; Inami, T; Satoh, T; Soejima, K
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 41:(2020)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2020-11-25
• Subjects: Pulmonary Hypertension; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2304
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and pulmonary artery compliance (PAC) are inversely related. However, the little is known about dynamics during exercise by disease difference. The aim of this study was to reveal the relationships of PVR and PAC during exercise between idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients. Methods: Sixty-two IPAH patients (45±9 y.o) and 359 CTEPH patients (63±13 y.o) with normal mean PAP and PAWP at rest underwent symptom-limited exercise test using supine cycle ergometer with right heart catheter. Results: There were no differences between baseline mean PAP and PAWP in 2 groups, however, cardiac output, SaO2 and SvO2 were lower in CTEPH group. Lower PAC (2.9±1.1 vs. 3.7±1.7 ml/mmHg, p<0.001) and higher PVR (2.3±1.0 vs. 1.9±1.0 wood.unit, p=0.016) were observed in CTEPH group. These trends were also seen at peak exercise. PVR-PAC relationship in CTEPH group was leftward shift compared with IPAH group (Figure 1). Conclusion: Resting and exercise PVR and PAC in CTEPH patients were worse than those in IPAH patients who had normal PAP and PAWP at rest. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding source: None