Leadless pacemaker implant in patients with a history of open heart surgery: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker. (25th November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Leadless pacemaker implant in patients with a history of open heart surgery: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker. (25th November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Leadless pacemaker implant in patients with a history of open heart surgery: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker
- Authors:
- Garweg, C
Iacopino, S
El-Chami, M.F
Veltmann, C
Clementy, N
Grubman, E
Johansen, J.B
Knops, R
Schalij, M.J
Piccini, J.P
Soejima, K
Stromberg, K
Fagan, D.H
Roberts, P.R - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The Micra transcatheter pacemaker has demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile relative to transvenous pacing. Patients with a history of open heart surgery have a higher risk of complications with transvenous pacemakers during follow-up. The experience with leadless pacemakers among a large cohort of patients with a history of open heart surgery has not been reported. Objective: To report outcomes in patients with a history of open heart surgery undergoing Micra implant. Methods: Patients undergoing Micra implant from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Post-Approval Registry (PAR) were included in the analysis. Baseline and procedural characteristics, major complications, and electrical performance were compared among patients with vs. without history of cardiac surgery. Results: A total of 331 out of 1815 (18.2%) patients had a history of open heart surgery, underwent Micra implant, and were followed for 19.4±10.4 months. The mean age was 74.6±13.5 years, 40% were female. The most common cardiac surgery was aortic valve surgery (71%) followed by mitral valve surgery (39%). Patients with prior open-heart surgery were more likely to have contraindications to transvenous pacing, were more likely to be on oral anticoagulants, and had more co-morbidities including atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and coronary artery disease (all p<0.005). Implantation was successful in 327 of 331 patients (98.8%) with a median procedure time of 29 minutes. MeanAbstract: Background: The Micra transcatheter pacemaker has demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile relative to transvenous pacing. Patients with a history of open heart surgery have a higher risk of complications with transvenous pacemakers during follow-up. The experience with leadless pacemakers among a large cohort of patients with a history of open heart surgery has not been reported. Objective: To report outcomes in patients with a history of open heart surgery undergoing Micra implant. Methods: Patients undergoing Micra implant from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Post-Approval Registry (PAR) were included in the analysis. Baseline and procedural characteristics, major complications, and electrical performance were compared among patients with vs. without history of cardiac surgery. Results: A total of 331 out of 1815 (18.2%) patients had a history of open heart surgery, underwent Micra implant, and were followed for 19.4±10.4 months. The mean age was 74.6±13.5 years, 40% were female. The most common cardiac surgery was aortic valve surgery (71%) followed by mitral valve surgery (39%). Patients with prior open-heart surgery were more likely to have contraindications to transvenous pacing, were more likely to be on oral anticoagulants, and had more co-morbidities including atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and coronary artery disease (all p<0.005). Implantation was successful in 327 of 331 patients (98.8%) with a median procedure time of 29 minutes. Mean pacing capture thresholds (PCTs) at implant were 0.66±0.51V and remained stable through follow-up. There were 11 major complications in 10 cardiac surgery patients, with no device or procedure-related infections reported. The major complication rate was 3.1% (Figure) and was not significantly different than that of patients without a history of open heart surgery (HR: 0.85, P=0.640). There was 1 cardiac perforation (with no intervention required) in the open heart surgery group (0.3%) and there were 14 cardiac perforations (0.94%, P=0.332) in the non-open heart surgery group of which 10 required intervention. Conclusion: The Micra transcatheter pacemaker can be safely implanted in patients with a history of open heart surgery, with a similar long-term safety profile to patients without a history of open heart surgery. Importantly, there were no device-related infections reported in either group. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Medtronic, Inc. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European heart journal. Volume 41:(2020)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- European heart journal
- Issue:
- Volume 41:(2020)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 41, Issue 2 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0041-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11-25
- Subjects:
- Antibradycardia Pacing
Cardiology -- Periodicals
Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.12005 - Journal URLs:
- http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0773 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0195-668X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.717500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25486.xml