Self-navigated versus navigator-gated 3D MRI sequence for non-enhanced aortic root measurement in transcatheter aortic valve intervention. (8th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pamminger, M; Kranewitter, C; Kremser, C; Reindl, M; Reinstadler, SJ; Reiter, G; Piccini, D; Tiller, C; Holzknecht, M; Klug, G; Metzler, B; Mayr, A
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 22(2021)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2021-02-08
• Subjects: Cardiovascular system -- Imaging -- Periodicals; Heart -- Imaging -- Periodicals; 616.10754
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa356.319
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-2404

Abstract

Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements: Type of funding sources: None. Background: Preprocedural transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) evaluation requires reliable aortic root measurements for correct valve sizing. Purpose: To prospectively compare image-quality, reliability and graft sizing of a prototype self-navigated and a navigator-gated non-contrast three dimensional (3D) whole-heart magnetic-resonance-angiography (MRA) sequence with computed-tomography-angiography (CTA) for planning transcatheter-aortic-valve-intervention (TAVI). Methods: Self- and navigator-gated 1.5T MRA were performed in 27 patients (aged 83 ± 5 years, 41% male) for aortic root sizing and coronary ostia height measurements; 15 (56%) patients underwent additional CTA. Subjective-image quality was graded on a 4-point Likert scale, objective MRA image-quality was assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Continuous MRA and CTA measurements were analyzed with regression and Bland-Altman analysis, valve sizing by kappa statistics. Results: Median image-quality as rated by two observers was 1.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-3] for self-navigated MRA and 1 [IQR 1-2] for navigator-gated MRA (p = 0.059). SNR and CNR were comparable between MRA sequences (p = 0.471 and 0.445, respectively). Acquisition time was shorter for self-navigated MRA compared to navigator-gated MRA (5.5 ± 1 minutes vs, 6.5 ± 2 minutes, p = 0.029). Inter-observer correlation of aortic root measurements was high to very high for both self- and navigator-gated MRA (r = 0.75 to 0.94 and r = 0.85 to 0.96, respectively, all p < 0.0001). Theoretical prosthetic valve sizing of self-navigated MRA and CTA was equivalent (κ=1). However, in four patients (15%) one coronary ostium each (right coronary artery 3, left main artery 1) was not clearly definable on self-navigated MRA. Conclusion: Self-navigated MRA enables aortic annulus TAVI measurements without significant difference to navigator-gated MRA at shortened acquisition time. Prosthesis sizing by self-navigated MRA measurements is equivalent to navigator-gated MRA and CTA-based choice.