HDR brachytherapy using cylinder, tandem-ovoid (T&O) and interstitial implant with prognosis. Issue 1 (January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Malik, Sadiq R; Ahmed, Mushfika; Reza, Md Shohel; Bairagi, Ashish K; Yeasmin, Nilufa; Banu, Parveen Akhter; Rukhsana, Naheed; Naher, Lutfun
• Is Part Of: Journal of physics. Volume 1718:Issue 1(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-01
• Subjects: High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy -- cervical cancer -- ICBT and interstitial implant; Physics -- Congresses; 530.5
• DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1718/1/012016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1742-6588

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Among the therapeutic modalities available for the treatment of cervical cancer, irradiation is regarded to be the standerd treatment for all tumor stages, which includes external beam radiation therapy and HDR brachytherapy or a combination of these two. This modality of cancer, needless to say, is prevalent in Bangladesh as the women are coming forward for its detection. Dramatic advances have been made in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Radiation treatment planning has evolved from two-dimensional to three-dimensional, incorporating magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography into the treatment paradigm. This allows for better delineation and coverage of the tumor, as well as improved avoidance of surrounding organs. Brachytherapy applications are not restricted to one method only; any method could be combined with another, as well as other radiotherapy techniques. In cervical cancer, intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) has been used for practical reasons. Lately though, combination of ICBT and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) techniques are being evaluated in deference to feasibility, practicality and reproducibility. Advanced brachytherapy can achieve very high rates of local control with a reduction in morbidity, compared with historic approaches. This study provides an overview of state-of-the-art gynecologic brachytherapy, with a focus on recent advances and their implications for women with cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: Three patients were selected on different staging. Three different types of applicator (Cylinder, Tandem and Ovoid and Interstitial Implant) were inserted according to the patient's anatomy and staging. Prescribed dose were different for the implant technique. Result: Progress from 2D- to 3D-based imaging and treatment planning for cervical cancer brachytherapy has improved local control, reduced toxicity, and improved overall survival for women. Conclusion: The result of our study indicates that a precise delivery of treatment by applying a appropriate applicator and the choice of treatment planning technique is more important for a better outcome.