An approach to derive seismic fragility curves. Issue 1 (January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vedhanayaghi, V J; Manoharan, M; Jasper Daniel, J; Premkumar, S; ArunBharathi, S
• Is Part Of: IOP conference series. Volume 1026:Issue 1(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-01
• Subjects: vulnerability -- retrofitting -- PGD -- fragility curves -- seismic assessment -- URM; Materials science -- Periodicals; 620.1105
• DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1026/1/012007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1757-8981

Abstract

Abstract: Seismic risk assessment is needed for the evaluation of disaster management, emergency preparedness and prior retrofitting. Based on feasible collapse mechanisms and calculation of their associated seismic parameter Peak Ground Displacement, the failure analysis of the structure is identified. Further, the outputs are manipulated to produce a measure vulnerability obtained from failure analysis. In regions of moderate and high seismicity, Zone – III Fragility analysis is used. An investigation is made on low rise Unreinforced masonry (URM) structure located in Zone – III, particularly in Chennai. To obtain capacity curve and bi-linear capacity curve the structure is modelled as Equivalent Frame Model (EFM), and non – linear static pushover analysis (NPOA).The structure damages, under various level of seismic excitation was developed by an analytical seismic fragility curve. For prioritizing retrofit, pre-earthquake planning, and loss estimation tools such as cost-benefit analysis this curve is utilized. The damage states considered for determining probability of exceeding a specified damage state involved in fragility curve generation are slight, moderate, extreme and collapse.