Constituting settler colonialism: the 'boundary problem', liberal equality, and settler state-making in Australia's Northern Territory. Issue 4 (2nd October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Spitzer, Aaron John
• Is Part Of: Postcolonial studies. Volume 22:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 545
• Page End: 564
• Publication Date: 2019-10-02
• Subjects: Settler colonialism -- constitutions -- metapolitics -- Northern Territory -- boundary question; Postcolonialism -- Periodicals; 325.3
• DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2019.1690763
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-8790

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Between Indigenous sovereignty and settler colonisation lie contested frontiers. I suggest Australia's Northern Territory is one such frontier. This paper explores the 1998 settler campaign for Northern Territory statehood, the key to which was the framing of a constitution designed to eliminate Indigenous autonomy and empower settlers. I make three contributions. First, I showcase how settler colonialism is metapolitical, implicating political theory's notorious 'boundary problem' in an effort to reconstitute Indigenous territories as 'ours' and Indigenous demoi as 'us'. Second, I show that settlers may wage this metapolitical campaign using individual rights, to challenge as illiberal, and thus de-constitute, Indigenous demotic and territorial boundaries. Finally, I show that when Indigenous peoples resist by seeking to constitutionally entrench their own, alternate answers to the 'boundary question', there arises a dilemma over whether settler rights or Indigenous boundaries are the rightful 'subject of justice'.