Evidence-Based Validation of Hemolysis Index Thresholds by Use of Retrospective Clinical Data. (15th January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evidence-Based Validation of Hemolysis Index Thresholds by Use of Retrospective Clinical Data. (15th January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Evidence-Based Validation of Hemolysis Index Thresholds by Use of Retrospective Clinical Data
- Authors:
- Mays, James A
Greene, Dina N
Merrill, Anna E
Mathias, Patrick C - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Semiquantitative hemolysis indices (HIs) are used by chemistry analyzers to measure sample integrity, but there is little standardization in HI reporting or validation of analyte-specific HI flagging. Additional methods of HI threshold validation are needed. Methods: We retrospectively queried serum and plasma potassium measurements, HIs, and contemporaneous whole blood potassium measurements. Serum and plasma values were compared to whole blood values drawn within 6 h (n = 6422 pairs), and discrepancies between values were compared across HIs. We also retrieved orders of potassium-lowering medications occurring shortly after release of potassium results from hemolyzed samples. Results: While nonhemolyzed samples showed high agreement, a significant percentage of released hemolyzed samples (36.1% of the most hemolyzed group) were discrepant by 1 mEq/L or more. In total, 15.5% of patients with an order from the hyperkalemia order set had the order after a hemolyzed value; the majority of those patients (42 of 46; 91.3%) received a potassium-lowering medication, most of whom did not have a redraw before drug administration. Conclusions: Retrospective review of discrepancies identified marked inconsistencies among higher HI samples and identified opportunities for improving the laboratory reporting policy, offering a clinical validation of the HI thresholds for potassium. Clinicians generally treated patients with hemolyzed samples, underscoring theAbstract: Background: Semiquantitative hemolysis indices (HIs) are used by chemistry analyzers to measure sample integrity, but there is little standardization in HI reporting or validation of analyte-specific HI flagging. Additional methods of HI threshold validation are needed. Methods: We retrospectively queried serum and plasma potassium measurements, HIs, and contemporaneous whole blood potassium measurements. Serum and plasma values were compared to whole blood values drawn within 6 h (n = 6422 pairs), and discrepancies between values were compared across HIs. We also retrieved orders of potassium-lowering medications occurring shortly after release of potassium results from hemolyzed samples. Results: While nonhemolyzed samples showed high agreement, a significant percentage of released hemolyzed samples (36.1% of the most hemolyzed group) were discrepant by 1 mEq/L or more. In total, 15.5% of patients with an order from the hyperkalemia order set had the order after a hemolyzed value; the majority of those patients (42 of 46; 91.3%) received a potassium-lowering medication, most of whom did not have a redraw before drug administration. Conclusions: Retrospective review of discrepancies identified marked inconsistencies among higher HI samples and identified opportunities for improving the laboratory reporting policy, offering a clinical validation of the HI thresholds for potassium. Clinicians generally treated patients with hemolyzed samples, underscoring the importance of maintaining sample quality. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of applied laboratory medicine. Volume 3:Number 1(2018)
- Journal:
- Journal of applied laboratory medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 3:Number 1(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 3, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0003-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 109
- Page End:
- 114
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01-15
- Subjects:
- Clinical chemistry -- Periodicals
Diagnosis, Laboratory -- Periodicals
616.0756 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
https://academic.oup.com/jalm ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1373/jalm.2017.024992 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2576-9456
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25352.xml