Cost-effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Interventions for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review. Issue 3 (22nd March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chowdhury, Anonnya R.; Graham, Petra L.; Schofield, Deborah; Cunich, Michelle; Nicholas, Michael
• Is Part Of: Clinical journal of pain. Volume 38:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 197
• Page End: 207
• Publication Date: 2022-03-22
• Subjects: chronic pain -- multidisciplinary intervention -- economic evaluation -- cost-benefit analysis -- cost-effectiveness analysis -- cost-utility analysis; Pain -- Periodicals; Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Analgesia -- Periodicals; 616.047205
• DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0749-8047

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults is a global health and economic problem. The aim of this paper was to systematically review and determine what proportion of multidisciplinary approaches to managing chronic musculoskeletal pain are cost-effective. Materials and Methods: The EconLit, Embase, and PubMed electronic databases were searched for randomized and nonrandomized economic evaluation studies of nonpharmaceutical multidisciplinary chronic pain management interventions published from inception through to August 2019. Results: Seven studies comprising 2095 patients were included. All studies involved diverse multidisciplinary teams in one or more of the study arms. All studies involved chronic (both chronic and subacute) low back pain and were economic evaluations from either a societal or health care perspective. Two of the 3 studies that reported on a multidisciplinary pain intervention compared with nonmultidisciplinary intervention concluded favorable cost-effectiveness based on cost per quality adjusted life years gained, 1 study was not found to be cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness of the multidisciplinary intervention of interest was also not established by another 3-arm study. Two studies compared 2 multidisciplinary interventions; neither of these could definitively declare cost-effectiveness. The remaining study indicated the intervention by a multidisciplinary team was more effective but at a higher cost. None of the included studies used decision models to estimate long-term health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary programs. Discussion: There are few studies on the cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary chronic pain management interventions. This study encourages additional rigorous economic evaluations of multidisciplinary models for chronic pain management. Economic evaluations that enable extrapolating costs and effects of multidisciplinary programs beyond the time horizon of clinical trials may be more informative for clinicians and health administrators.