Simulation-Based Training Improves Fellows' Competence in Brain Death Discussion and Declaration. Issue 1 (26th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Patrick M.; Trando, Aaron; LaBuzetta, Jamie Nicole
• Is Part Of: Neurologist. Volume 27:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 6
• Page End: 10
• Publication Date: 2021-11-26
• Subjects: brain death -- medical education -- coma -- simulation -- neurocritical care; Nervous System Diseases -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Neurologie; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000354
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1074-7931

Abstract

Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Abstract : Background: Despite well-defined American Academy of Neurology guidelines for death by whole brain criteria (brain death), there is marked variability in national practice, which some have attributed to lack of formal education. Further, communication with surrogates and families about brain death is integral to brain death declaration. As such, we developed a targeted brain death curriculum combining didactics and simulation-based education to improve examination and subsequent communication skills with families. Methods: Multidisciplinary critical care fellows participated in (1) didactic and case-based curriculum, (2) brain death simulated examination (SimMan3G mannequin), and (3) a standardized family scenario with delivery of a brain death diagnosis to a surrogate "family member". Fellows completed a precurriculum and postcurriculum multiple choice knowledge test and survey (Likert 1 to 10 scale) evaluating measures regarding diagnosis and communication of brain death. t Test and 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analysis ( P <0.05). Results: Thirteen critical care fellows participated in the curriculum. Most fellows [80% (N=12)] had only participated in 0 to 5 brain death declarations before this intervention. There was significant improvement across all measures: self-rated knowledge ( P =0.004), perceived knowledge relative to peers ( P =0.002), confidence ( P =0.001), and comfort ( P =0.001) with performing a brain death exam, and comfort with family discussion ( P =0.01). Objective test scores improved from 56 to 73% after simulation ( P =0.004). All fellows found the curriculum beneficial. Conclusion: Trainees may lack sufficient exposure to brain death education. Didactics with simulation-based education can improve objective knowledge and subjective measures of comfort with brain death declaration and surrogate communication.