Acute myocardial infarction in a patient with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries and complex coronary anatomy—a case report. Issue 11 (2nd November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Asaad, Fahd; Sörensson, Peder; Rück, Andreas; Nagy, Edit; Jurga, Juliane; Ståhlberg, Marcus
• Editors: Egorova, Anastasia; Ahmed, A Shaheer; Al-Hijji, Mohammed; Abdalghafoor, Tamer; den Eynde, Jef Van; Ahmed, Nida
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 6:Issue 11(2023)
• Publication Date: 2022-11-02
• Subjects: Case report -- Acute myocardial infarction -- Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries -- Coronary artery anomalies; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Case studies -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Case studies -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac423
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2514-2119

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) is a rare congenital heart anomaly with atrioventricular and ventriculoarterial discordance that is often associated with other cardiac and coronary artery anomalies. Here, we report a case of a patient with ccTGA and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with challenging coronary anatomy that was treated with stress-perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (spCMR) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Case summary: A 46-year-old male smoker with ccTGA, dyslipidaemia, diabetes Type 2 managed with dietary restrictions and a family history of premature myocardial infarction, presented with typical chest pain, elevated cardiac troponin levels and ECG-changes indicative of ischaemia. The patient was diagnosed with NSTEMI and underwent initial urgent coronary angiography (CA) without apparent significant stenosis, although the right coronary artery (RCA) could not be selectively investigated. The patient had coronary anatomy 1R-2LCX according to the Leiden convention, which is the usual anatomy in patients with ccTGA. Despite this, CA was challenging due to the different anatomy compared with individuals with normally positioned great vessels. The patient remained highly symptomatic with chest pain at moderate exertion. To improve identification of the anatomic location and extent of ischaemia, we performed spCMR with adenosine. This revealed a limited septal infarction (likely embolic) in the right ventricle and reversible ischaemia in two inferior right ventricular segments. A second angiography, selectively investigating RCA demonstrated a significant stenosis in the distal RCA that was successfully treated with a drug-eluting stent. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements of the left coronary arteries demonstrated hemodynamically non-significant stenosis. The patient's symptoms resolved, and he remained asymptomatic at one month follow-up. Discussion: This ccTGA patient had multiple risk factors for coronary artery disease and presented with NSTEMI. Diagnosis and treatment were challenging due to complex cardiac anatomy and associated different origins of the coronary arteries. We highlight the importance of careful evaluation of the coronary anatomy and functional testing using for example spCMR and FFR to target the culprit coronary vessel(s) in ccTGA complicated by NSTEMI.