Experience of Treating COVID-19 With Remdesivir and Convalescent Plasma in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study. (21st August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Koirala, Janak; Gyanwali, Pradip; Gerzoff, Robert B; Bhattarai, Saroj; Nepal, Bipin; Manandhar, Rekha; Jha, Runa; Sharma, Sanjib; Sharma, Yuba Raj; Bastola, Anup; Murphy, Holly; Acharya, Subhash; Adhikari, Prabhat; Rajkarnikari, Manita; Vaidya, Karishma M; Panthi, Chhabi L; Bista, Bihungum; Giri, Grishma; Aryal, Shambhu; Pant, Suman; Pokharel, Akritee; Karki, Shristi; Basnet, Sangita; Koirala, Bhagawan; Dhimal, Meghnath
• Is Part Of: Open forum infectious diseases. Volume 8:Number 8(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-08-21
• Subjects: COVID-19 -- convalescent plasma -- remdesivir; Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Medical microbiology -- Periodicals; Infection -- Periodicals; 616.9
• DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab391
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2328-8957

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) and remdesivir (REM) have been approved for investigational use to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Nepal. Methods: In this prospective, multicentered study, we evaluated the safety and outcomes of treatment with CPT and/or REM in 1315 hospitalized COVID-19 patients over 18 years in 31 hospitals across Nepal. REM was administered to patients with moderate, severe, or life-threatening infection. CPT was administered to patients with severe to life-threatening infections who were at high risk for progression or clinical worsening despite REM. Clinical findings and outcomes were recorded until discharge or death. Results: Patients were classified as having moderate (24.2%), severe (64%), or life-threatening (11.7%) COVID-19 infection. The majority of CPT and CPT + REM recipients had severe to life-threatening infections (CPT 98.3%; CPT + REM 92.1%) and were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU; CPT 91.8%; CPT + REM 94.6%) compared with those who received REM alone (73.3% and 57.5%, respectively). Of 1083 patients with reported outcomes, 78.4% were discharged and 21.6% died. The discharge rate was 84% for REM (n = 910), 39% for CPT (n = 59), and 54.4% for CPT + REM (n = 114) recipients. In a logistic model comparing death vs discharge and adjusted for age, gender, steroid use, and severity, the predicted margin for discharge was higher for recipients of remdesivir alone (0.82; 95% CI, 0.79–0.84) compared with CPT (0.58; 95% CI, 0.47–0.70) and CPT + REM (0.67; 95% CI, 0.60–0.74) recipients. Adverse events of remdesivir and CPT were reported in <5% of patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a safe rollout of CPT and REM in a resource-limited setting. Remdesivir recipients had less severe infection and better outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier. NCT04570982.