Looking at the bigger picture: how the wider health financing context affects the implementation of the Tanzanian Community Health Funds. Issue 1 (25th January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Renggli, Sabine; Mayumana, Iddy; Mshana, Christopher; Mboya, Dominick; Kessy, Flora; Tediosi, Fabrizio; Pfeiffer, Constanze; Aerts, Ann; Lengeler, Christian
• Is Part Of: Health policy and planning. Volume 34:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 12
• Page End: 23
• Publication Date: 2019-01-25
• Subjects: Tanzania -- community-based health insurance -- health financing -- health system research -- operations research; Medical policy -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; Public health -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; Health planning -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; 362.1091724
• DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czy091
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-1080

Abstract

Abstract: In Tanzania, the health financing system is extremely fragmented with strategies in place to supplement funds provided from the central level. One of these strategies is the Community Health Fund (CHF), a voluntary health insurance scheme for the informal rural sector. As its implementation has been challenging, we investigated different CHF implementation practices and how these practices and the wider health financing context affect CHF implementation and potentially enrolment. Two councils were purposively selected for this study. Routine data relevant for understanding CHF implementation in the wider health financing context were collected at council and public health facility level. Additionally, an economic costing approach was used to estimate CHF administration cost and analyse its financing sources. Our results showed the importance of considering different CHF implementation practices and the wider health financing context when looking at CHF performance. Exemption policies and healthcare-seeking behaviour influenced negatively the maximum potential enrolment rate of the voluntary CHF scheme. Higher revenues from user fees, user fee policies and fund pooling mechanisms might have furthermore set incentives for care providers to prioritize user fees over CHF revenues. Costing results clearly pointed out the lack of financial sustainability of the CHF. The financial analysis however also showed that thanks to significant contributions from other health financing mechanisms to CHF administration, the CHF could be left with more than 70% of its revenues for financing services. To make the CHF work, major improvements in CHF implementation practices would be needed, but given the wider health financing context and healthcare-seeking behaviours, it is questionable whether such improvements are feasible, scalable and value for money. Thus, our results call for a reconsideration of approaches taken to address the challenges in health financing and demonstrate that the CHF cannot be looked at as a stand-alone system.