Variety and management of developmental conflicts: the case of the Olkaria IV geothermal energy project in Kenya. Issue 6 (2nd November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kong'ani, Lilian Namuma S.; Wahome, Raphael G.; Thenya, Thuita
• Is Part Of: Conflict, security & development. Volume 21:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 781
• Page End: 804
• Publication Date: 2021-11-02
• Subjects: Conflict dynamics -- geothermal project implementation -- involuntary resettlement -- project affected persons -- sustainability; Security, International -- Periodicals; Pacific settlement of international disputes -- Periodicals; Economic development -- Periodicals; World politics -- 1989- -- Periodicals; 322.5
• DOI: 10.1080/14678802.2021.2000806
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1467-8802

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The development of geothermal energy installations generates varied conflicts in Kenya that often escalate because of improper management. Yet, these developmental project conflict dynamics remain poorly understood. To better understand the dynamics of these conflicts, quantitative and qualitative data were collected from the Olkaria IV project-affected persons (PAPs) household heads using questionnaires, focus group discussions and key informant interviews. The qualitative data was arranged into socioeconomic, cultural, environmental and political themes and the proportion of respondents within each theme was calculated. The triggers for the conflicts included inadequate communication and participation in decision-making, unsatisfactory relocation logistics, and unfulfilled compensation promises. Also, the formulation and implementation of the resettlement action plan was inadequately negotiated with the PAPs. The effects of the conflicts on the PAPs' livelihoods were severe. The conflicts were managed mainly through competition and avoidance strategies. Subsequent dissatisfaction on the part of the PAPs led to unrest that almost derailed the project. Planners need to be inclusive of the local community in the design of large development projects. Inclusiveness in planning would secure community buy-in, remove unrealistic pledges or expectations, and smoothen project implementation.