Living losses in stroke caregiving: A qualitative systematic review of systematic reviews on psycho-socio-emotional challenges and coping mechanisms. Issue 3 (March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Choo, Ping Ying; Shaik, Muhammad Amin; Tan-Ho, Geraldine; Lee, Jimmy; Ho, Andy Hau Yan
• Is Part Of: International journal of stroke. Volume 18:Issue 3(2023)
• Page Start: 268
• Page End: 277
• Publication Date: 2023-03
• Subjects: Stroke caregiving -- family caregivers -- psycho-socio-emotional challenges and needs -- living losses -- non-death grief -- dyadic coping -- meaning-making -- psychosocial intervention; 616.8005
• DOI: 10.1177/17474930221104908
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-4930

Abstract

Background: Stroke compromises the quality of life and wellbeing of stroke survivors and families as a whole. The unexpected caregiving responsibilities often cause psychological distress, overwhelming emotions, living losses and grief, and relational conflicts with stroke survivors. Despite the increasing research to better understand their needs, empirically sound and holistic psychosocial interventions for stroke caregivers are lacking. Aims: This study aims to consolidate psycho-socio-emotional needs and challenges in the existing systematic reviews and offer potential directions for psychosocial interventions to better support caregivers at a psycho-socio-emotional level. Methods: This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA guideline and employed the PICo (population, phenomena of interest, context) framework to screen for relevant systematic reviews for analysis. Six major databases were searched, including Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, Global Health, Medline, PsycArticles, and PsycInfo between 2010 and 2020. Ten systematic reviews were selected for full-text analysis using thematic synthesis. Summary of review: Data synthesis revealed eight themes with sixteen sub-themes, all together organized into two main theme categories. The psycho-socio-emotional challenges included disruptions to (1) psychological homeostasis, (2) role equilibrium, (3) familial connection, and (4) caregiving empowerment . The psycho-socio-emotional coping mechanisms, which could be adopted to buffer against the identified challenges, involved (1) recalibration of normality and balance, (2) psychosocial support and caregiver relief, (3) relational reorientation and dyadic coping, and (4) institutional holistic care and support . Conclusion: The findings accentuate the importance of addressing living losses and grief emerging from the caregiving journey, as well as facilitating meaning reconstruction to safeguard caregivers' wellbeing. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.