Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials. Issue 11 (20th July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials. Issue 11 (20th July 2020)
- Main Title:
- Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials
- Authors:
- Yu, Jin-Tai
Xu, Wei
Tan, Chen-Chen
Andrieu, Sandrine
Suckling, John
Evangelou, Evangelos
Pan, An
Zhang, Can
Jia, Jianping
Feng, Lei
Kua, Ee-Heok
Wang, Yan-Jiang
Wang, Hui-Fu
Tan, Meng-Shan
Li, Jie-Qiong
Hou, Xiao-He
Wan, Yu
Tan, Lin
Mok, Vincent
Tan, Lan
Dong, Qiang
Touchon, Jacques
Gauthier, Serge
Aisen, Paul S
Vellas, Bruno - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Evidence on preventing Alzheimer's disease (AD) is challenging to interpret due to varying study designs with heterogeneous endpoints and credibility. We completed a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence with prospective designs to propose evidence-based suggestions on AD prevention. Methods: Electronic databases and relevant websites were searched from inception to 1 March 2019. Both observational prospective studies (OPSs) and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The multivariable-adjusted effect estimates were pooled by random-effects models, with credibility assessment according to its risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision. Levels of evidence and classes of suggestions were summarised. Results: A total of 44 676 reports were identified, and 243 OPSs and 153 RCTs were eligible for analysis after exclusion based on pre-decided criteria, from which 104 modifiable factors and 11 interventions were included in the meta-analyses. Twenty-one suggestions are proposed based on the consolidated evidence, with Class I suggestions targeting 19 factors: 10 with Level A strong evidence (education, cognitive activity, high body mass index in latelife, hyperhomocysteinaemia, depression, stress, diabetes, head trauma, hypertension in midlife and orthostatic hypotension) and 9 with Level B weaker evidence (obesity in midlife, weight loss in late life, physical exercise, smoking, sleep, cerebrovascular disease, frailty, atrialAbstract : Background: Evidence on preventing Alzheimer's disease (AD) is challenging to interpret due to varying study designs with heterogeneous endpoints and credibility. We completed a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence with prospective designs to propose evidence-based suggestions on AD prevention. Methods: Electronic databases and relevant websites were searched from inception to 1 March 2019. Both observational prospective studies (OPSs) and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The multivariable-adjusted effect estimates were pooled by random-effects models, with credibility assessment according to its risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision. Levels of evidence and classes of suggestions were summarised. Results: A total of 44 676 reports were identified, and 243 OPSs and 153 RCTs were eligible for analysis after exclusion based on pre-decided criteria, from which 104 modifiable factors and 11 interventions were included in the meta-analyses. Twenty-one suggestions are proposed based on the consolidated evidence, with Class I suggestions targeting 19 factors: 10 with Level A strong evidence (education, cognitive activity, high body mass index in latelife, hyperhomocysteinaemia, depression, stress, diabetes, head trauma, hypertension in midlife and orthostatic hypotension) and 9 with Level B weaker evidence (obesity in midlife, weight loss in late life, physical exercise, smoking, sleep, cerebrovascular disease, frailty, atrial fibrillation and vitamin C). In contrast, two interventions are not recommended: oestrogen replacement therapy (Level A2) and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (Level B). Interpretation: Evidence-based suggestions are proposed, offering clinicians and stakeholders current guidance for the prevention of AD. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry. Volume 91:Issue 11(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
- Issue:
- Volume 91:Issue 11(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 91, Issue 11 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 91
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0091-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 1201
- Page End:
- 1209
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07-20
- Subjects:
- alzheimer's disease -- epidemiology -- meta-analysis -- systematic reviews
Neurology -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
616.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://jnnp.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?action=archive&journal=192 ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321913 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-3050
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25284.xml