Impact of early surveillance on safety signal identification in the CathPCI DELTA study. Issue 1 (11th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Majithia, Arjun; Matheny, Michael E; Dani, Sourbha S; Paulus, Jessica K; Marinac-Dabic, Danica; Robbins, Susan; Ssemaganda, Henry; Hewitt, Kathleen; Ponirakis, Angelo; Loyo-Berrios, Nilsa; Moussa, Issam; Drozda, Joseph; Normand, Sharon-Lise; Resnic, Frederic S
• Is Part Of: BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies. Volume 2:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-11-11
• Subjects: active surveillance -- device safety -- device surveillance -- vascular devices; Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery -- Research -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Research -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000047
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2631-4940

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The CathPCI Data Extraction and Longitudinal Trend Analysis study was designed to determine the feasibility of conducting prospective surveillance of a large national registry to perform comparative safety analyses of medical devices. We sought to determine whether the complementary use of retrospective case data could improve safety signal detection time. Design: We performed a simulated surveillance study of the comparative safety of the Mynx vascular closure device (VCD) with propensity score matched alternate VCD recipients, using both retrospective and prospective cohort data. Setting: Centers within the USA using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI Registry. Participants: Percutaneous coronary intervention cases captured within the NCDR CathPCI Registry from July 1, 2009 to September 30, 2013 were included in the analysis. Interventions: None. Main outcome measures: Absolute and relative risk (RR) of any vascular complication (a composite of bleeding at access site, hematoma at access site, retroperitoneal bleeding, and other vascular complications requiring treatment); time to signal detection. Results: A safety alert was detected for the primary outcome of "any vascular complication" after 15 months of surveillance and was sustained for the study duration (absolute risk of any vascular complication, 1.20% vs 0.73%, RR, 1.63; 95% CI 1.50 to 1.79; p<0.001). The safety signal was identified 12 months earlier with the use of retrospective case data than during the initial study. Conclusions: Prospective, active surveillance of cardiovascular registries is feasible to perform comparative analyses of medical devices. Retrospective data may complement prospective surveillance to improve time to signal detection, indicating the need for earlier prospective application of safety surveillance for devices new to the market.