Diastolic-systolic velocity ratio to detect coronary stenoses under physiological resting conditions: a mechanistic study. Issue 1 (1st March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Waard, Guus A; Broyd, Christopher J; Cook, Christopher M; van der Hoeven, Nina W; Petraco, Ricardo; Nijjer, Sukhjinder S; van de Hoef, Tim P; Echavarria-Pinto, Mauro; Meuwissen, Martijn; Sen, Sayan; Knaapen, Paul; Escaned, Javier; Piek, Jan J; van Royen, Niels; Davies, Justin E
• Is Part Of: Open heart. Volume 6:Issue 1(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-03-01
• Subjects: echocardiography -- stable angina -- microvascular; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Patients -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000968
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-595X

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Diastolic-systolic velocity ratio (DSVR) is a resting index to assess stenoses in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). DSVR can be measured by echocardiographic or intracoronary Doppler flow velocity. The objective of this cohort study was to elucidate the fundamental rationale underlying the decreased DSVR in coronary stenoses. Methods: In cohort 1, simultaneous measurements of intracoronary Doppler flow velocity and pressure were acquired in the LAD of 228 stable patients. Phasic stenosis resistance, microvascular resistance and total vascular resistance (defined as stenosis and microvascular resistance combined) were studied during physiological resting conditions. Stenoses were classified according to severity by strata of 0.10 fractional flow reserve (FFR) units. Results: DSVR was decreased in stenoses with lower FFR. Stenosis resistance was equal in systole and diastole for every FFR stratum. Microvascular resistance was consistently higher during systole than diastole. In lower FFR strata, stenosis resistance as a percentage of the total vascular resistance increases both during systole and diastole. The difference between the stenosis resistance as a percentage of total vascular resistance during systole and diastole increases for lower FFR strata, with an accompanying rise in diastolic-systolic resistance ratio. A significant inverse correlation was observed between DSVR and the diastolic-systolic resistance ratio (r=0.91, p<0.001). In cohort 2 (n=23), DSVR was measured both invasively and non-invasively by transthoracic echocardiography, yielding a good correlation (r=0.82, p<0.001). Conclusions: The rationale by which DSVR is decreased distal to coronary stenoses is dependent on a comparatively higher influence of the increased stenosis resistance on total vascular resistance during diastole than systole.