Diagnostic Utility and Significance of Performing Multistep Level Sections in Breast and Gynecologic Biopsy Specimens. Issue 4 (26th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Amin, Al; Yasmeen, Sayeeda; Jeyachandran, Devi; Khoury, Thaer; Desouki, Mohamed Mokhtar
• Is Part Of: American journal of clinical pathology. Volume 156:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 620
• Page End: 624
• Publication Date: 2021-03-26
• Subjects: Multistep level sections -- Histology -- Gynecologic -- Breast -- Pathology; Diagnosis, Laboratory -- Periodicals; Pathology -- Periodicals; 616.07
• DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa277
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-9173

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The significance of performing multistep level sections, including preparation of unstained sections in breast and gynecologic biopsy specimens, has been studied. Methods: Consecutive H&E-stained level sections of 785 atypical and malignant biopsy specimens were included. The diagnostic material was categorized into present, absent, increased in size, or depleted. If the multistep level sections helped in establishing the diagnosis after a nondiagnostic material or the tissue significantly increased in size, this was considered a positive impact. Results: No effect and positive impact of performing multistep level sections were obtained in 84.8% and 15.2% by preparing a second level and 97.2% and 2.8% by preparing a third level, respectively. Eighteen (2.3%) of the diagnoses could have been missed without performing a second level, while 8 (1%) could have been missed without performing a third level. The intervening unstained sections were used in 27 of 785 (3.4%) of the cases. Conclusions: Staining two level sections with H&E significantly affected the diagnosis. However, preparing a third level did not improve the diagnosis. A universal protocol should be considered to standardize the handling of biopsy specimens among laboratories.