Development of a 'universal-reporter' outcome measure (UROM) for patient and healthcare professional completion: a mixed methods study demonstrating a novel concept for optimal questionnaire design. Issue 8 (24th August 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Development of a 'universal-reporter' outcome measure (UROM) for patient and healthcare professional completion: a mixed methods study demonstrating a novel concept for optimal questionnaire design. Issue 8 (24th August 2019)
- Main Title:
- Development of a 'universal-reporter' outcome measure (UROM) for patient and healthcare professional completion: a mixed methods study demonstrating a novel concept for optimal questionnaire design
- Authors:
- Macefield, Rhiannon
Brookes, Sara
Blazeby, Jane
Avery, Kerry - Other Names:
- author non-byline.
Andronis Lazaros author non-byline.
Blencowe Natalie author non-byline.
Calvert Melanie author non-byline.
Coast Joanna author non-byline.
Draycott Tim author non-byline.
Donovan Jenny author non-byline.
Gooberman-Hill Rachael author non-byline.
Longman Robert author non-byline.
Mathers Jonathan author non-byline.
Pinkney Tom author non-byline.
Reeves Barnaby author non-byline.
Rogers Chris author non-byline.
Torrance Andrew author non-byline.
Woodward Mark author non-byline.
Ashton Kate author non-byline.
Clayton Gemma author non-byline.
Clout Madeleine author non-byline.
Dumville Jo author non-byline.
Elliott Daisy author non-byline.
Ellis Lucy author non-byline.
Harris Rosie author non-byline.
Lovegrove Richard author non-byline.
McMullan Christel author non-byline.
Nelson Helen van der author non-byline.
Pope Caroline author non-byline.
Pullyblank Anne author non-byline.
Rooshenas Leila author non-byline.
Siassakos Dimitrios author non-byline.
Strong Sean author non-byline.
Talbot Helen author non-byline.
Welton Nicky author non-byline.
Winter Cathy author non-byline.
Blazeby Jane author non-byline.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: To describe the novel concept of, and methods for developing, a 'universal-reporter' outcome measure (UROM); a single questionnaire for completion by patients and/or healthcare professionals (HCPs) when views on the same subject are required. Design: A mixed methods study with three phases—phase I: identification of relevant content domains from existing clinical tools, patient questionnaires and in-depth interviews with multistakeholders; phase II: item development using a novel approach that considered plain language in conjunction with medical terminology; and phase III: pretesting with multistakeholders using cognitive interviews. Setting: A case study in surgical wound assessment undertaken in two UK hospital trusts and one university setting. Participants: Patients who had recently undergone general abdominal surgery and healthcare professionals involved in post-surgical wound care. Results: Phase I: In the example case study, 19 relevant content domains were identified from two clinical tools, two patient questionnaires and 19 multistakeholder interviews (nine patients, 10 HCPs). Phase II: Domains were operationalised into items and subitems (secondary components to collect further information, if relevant). The version after pretesting had 16 items, five of which included further subitems. Plain language in conjunction with medical terminology was applicable in nine (27%) items/subitems. Phase III: Pretesting with 28 patients and 14 HCPs foundAbstract : Objectives: To describe the novel concept of, and methods for developing, a 'universal-reporter' outcome measure (UROM); a single questionnaire for completion by patients and/or healthcare professionals (HCPs) when views on the same subject are required. Design: A mixed methods study with three phases—phase I: identification of relevant content domains from existing clinical tools, patient questionnaires and in-depth interviews with multistakeholders; phase II: item development using a novel approach that considered plain language in conjunction with medical terminology; and phase III: pretesting with multistakeholders using cognitive interviews. Setting: A case study in surgical wound assessment undertaken in two UK hospital trusts and one university setting. Participants: Patients who had recently undergone general abdominal surgery and healthcare professionals involved in post-surgical wound care. Results: Phase I: In the example case study, 19 relevant content domains were identified from two clinical tools, two patient questionnaires and 19 multistakeholder interviews (nine patients, 10 HCPs). Phase II: Domains were operationalised into items and subitems (secondary components to collect further information, if relevant). The version after pretesting had 16 items, five of which included further subitems. Plain language in conjunction with medical terminology was applicable in nine (27%) items/subitems. Phase III: Pretesting with 28 patients and 14 HCPs found that the UROM was acceptable to both respondent groups. An unanticipated secondary finding of the study was that the combined use of plain language and medical terminology during questionnaire development may be a useful, novel technique for evaluating item interpretation and thereby identifying items with inadequate content validity. Conclusion: UROMs are a novel approach to outcome assessment that are acceptable to both patients and HCPs. Combining plain language and medical terminology during item development is a recommended technique to improve accuracy of item interpretation and content validity during questionnaire design. More work is needed to further validate this novel approach and explore the application of UROMs to other settings. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 8(2019)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 8(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 8 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0009-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-08-24
- Subjects:
- content validity -- item construction -- outcome measurement -- patient-reported outcome -- questionnaire development
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029741 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25244.xml