Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium. Issue 1 (1st January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schopp, Pascal; Müller, Dominik; Technow, Frank; Melchinger, Albrecht E
• Is Part Of: Genetics. Volume 205:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 441
• Page End: 454
• Publication Date: 2017-01-01
• Subjects: genomic prediction -- synthetic populations -- GBLUP -- genetic relationships -- linkage disequilibrium -- GenPred -- Shared data resource -- genomic selection; Genetics -- Periodicals; 576.5
• DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.193243
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-6731

Abstract

Abstract: Synthetics play an important role in quantitative genetic research and plant breeding, but few studies have investigated the application of genomic prediction (GP) to these populations. Synthetics are generated by intermating a small number of parents (N P ) and thereby possess unique genetic properties, which make them especially suited for systematic investigations of factors contributing to the accuracy of GP. We generated synthetics in silico from N P = 2 to 32 maize ( Zea mays L.) lines taken from an ancestral population with either short- or long-range linkage disequilibrium (LD). In eight scenarios differing in relatedness of the training and prediction sets and in the types of data used to calculate the relationship matrix (QTL, SNPs, tag markers, and pedigree), we investigated the prediction accuracy (PA) of Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and analyzed contributions from pedigree relationships captured by SNP markers, as well as from cosegregation and ancestral LD between QTL and SNPs. The effects of training set size N T S and marker density were also studied. Sampling few parents (2 ≤ N P < 8 ) generates substantial sampl e LD that carries over into synthetics through cosegregation of alleles at linked loci. For fixed N T S, N P influences PA most strongly. If the training and prediction set are related, using N P < 8 parents yields high PA regardless of ancestral LD because SNPs capture pedigree relationships and Mendelian sampling through cosegregation. As N P increases, ancestral LD contributes more information, while other factors contribute less due to lower frequencies of closely related individuals. For unrelated prediction sets, only ancestral LD contributes information and accuracies were poor and highly variable for N P ≤ 4 due to large sample LD. For large N P, achieving moderate accuracy requires large N T S, long-range ancestral LD, and high marker density. Our approach for analyzing PA in synthetics provides new insights into the prospects of GP for many types of source populations encountered in plant breeding.