Variability in fish bioconcentration factors: Influences of study design and consequences for regulation. (January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wassenaar, Pim N.H.; Verbruggen, Eric M.J.; Cieraad, Ellen; Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M.; Vijver, Martina G.
• Is Part Of: Chemosphere. Volume 239(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-01
• Subjects: Bioconcentration factors -- Bioaccumulation assessment -- PBT-Assessment -- Variability; Pollution -- Periodicals; Pollution -- Physiological effect -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Atmospheric chemistry -- Periodicals; 551.511
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124731
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0045-6535

Abstract

Abstract: The fish bioconcentration factor (BCF) is an important aspect within bioaccumulation assessments. Several factors have been suggested to influence BCF values – including species, developmental stage, mixture exposure, and calculation method. However, their exact contribution to variance in BCF values is unknown. Within this study we assessed the relative impact of these test characteristics on BCF values and analyzed the reproducibility of aquatic exposure bioconcentration tests. Linear mixed effects analyses were performed on a newly develop database to investigate the relationship between the response variable (i.e. lipid normalized log BCF values) and several test characteristics as fixed effects. Lower BCF values were observed for substances that were simultaneously applied with high molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons compared to single substance exposure (with an average difference of −0.81 log BCF). Also, lower BCFs upon kinetic determination were observed compared to steady-state BCFs (log BCF -0.27), and lower BCFs for species from the Ostariophysi subcohort level (log BCF -0.17 to −0.15). In addition, data analysis showed high variation within BCF values for single substances (average SD = log BCF 0.21), which questions the robustness of the current bioaccumulation assessments. For example, the 95% confidence range of a BCF value of 2500 ranges from 953 ('not-bioaccumulative') to 6561 ('very bioaccumulative'). Our results show that the use of one single BCF leads to a high uncertainty in bioaccumulation assessments. We strongly recommend that within future bioconcentration studies, the used experimental design and test conditions are described in detail and justified to support solid interpretation. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Data analysis on fish BCF variability for a newly compiled dataset. BCFs were lower upon exposure to specific mixtures compared to single substances. BCF values were influenced by species type at subcohort level. BCFs calculated based on kinetic data were lower compared to steady-state BCFs. The use of one single BCF leads to a high uncertainty due to a high variation.