Risk prediction of atrial fibrillation and its complications in the community using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I: results from the BiomarCaRE Consortium. (14th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boerschel, C.S; Geelhoed, B; Niiranen, T; Camen, S; Donati, M.B; Den Ruijterg, H.M; Linneberg, A; Lochenl, M.L; Kuulasmaa, K; Blankenberg, S; Iacoviello, L; Zeller, T; Soederberg, S; Salomaa, V; Schnabel, R.B
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 42(2021)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2021-10-14
• Subjects: Diagnostic Methods; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0483
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is becoming increasingly common and is associated with serious complications. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) do not explain all AF cases. Blood-based biomarkers reflecting cardiac injury may help close this gap. High-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) has emerged as a potential predictor. Methods: We investigated the predictive ability of hsTnI for incident AF in 29, 227 participants (median age 52.6 years, 51.2% men) across four different European community cohorts of the Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe (BiomarCaRE) consortium in comparison to CVRF and established biomarkers (high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)). Results: During a median follow-up of 13.8 (lower and upper quartiles 4.5, 21.3) years, 1, 509 (5.2%) participants developed AF. Those in the highest fourth of hsTnI values at baseline (≥5.1 ng/L) had a 2.71-fold (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.31, 3.17; P<0.01) risk for developing AF compared to those in the lowest fourth (≤2.1 ng/L). In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models no statistically significant association was seen between hsTnI and AF, whereas NT-proBNP (hazard ratio (HR) per two-fold increase in NT-proBNP 1.64; 95% CI 1.56, 1.72; P<0.001) as well as hsCRP (HR ratio per two-fold increase in hsCRP 1.05; 95% CI 1.01, 1.10; P=0.01) were statistically significantly related to incident AF. Inclusion of hsTnI did not improve model discrimination over CVRFs (C-index CVRF 0.7914 vs. C-index CVRF, hsTnI 0.7927; 95% CI −0.0004, 0.0031; P=0.130). Higher hsTnI concentrations were associated with AF complications such as stroke (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.03, 1.51; P=0.02), heart failure (HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.12, 1.44; P<0.001) and cardiovascular events (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.08, 1.42; P<0.001) as well as overall mortality (HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.05, 1.25; P<0.001) in those who were diagnosed with AF. Conclusion: hsTnI as a biomarker of myocardial injury does not improve prediction of AF incidence beyond classical CVRFs. However, it is associated with AF complications and mortality after AF onset probably reflecting underlying subclinical cardiovascular impairment. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013