Time at home among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin. (14th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Deitelzweig, S; Keshishian, A; Kang, A; Jenkins, A; Atreja, N; Schuler, P; Jiang, J; Lovett, K; Yuce, H; Lip, G.Y.H
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 42(2021)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2021-10-14
• Subjects: Oral Anticoagulation; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0573
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Clinical trials and real-world database studies have shown the benefits of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared to warfarin; however, measures of functional outcomes are critical in evaluating a patient's quality of life. Previous measures of time spent out of hospital in a home setting and time spent receiving disease-related care among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients are lacking in the current literature. Purpose: This analysis was based on the previously published ARISTOPHANES study, and used multiple data sources to evaluate the amount of time spent at a patient's home among NVAF patients who were prescribed NOACs versus warfarin. Methods: This retrospective observational study used US data from CMS Medicare and four commercial databases to select adult NVAF patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin (01JAN2013–30SEP2015). Time at home and time at home without external AF-related care were measured during the 180 days after the index date (OAC prescription). Time at home was defined as days from index date without any of the following: an inpatient, skilled nursing facility or nursing facility, hospice, or inpatient rehabilitation facility admission. Time at home and without external AF-related care was defined as days away from home and days with a claim for bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, AF, or an INR test. Each day a claim was observed was counted as one day. In each database, three 1:1 NOAC-warfarin propensity-score-matched (PSM) cohorts were created before pooling the results. After PSM, a subgroup of patients who were alive and had ≥180 days of follow-up was created. Poisson regression was conducted in each NOAC-warfarin matched cohort to compare time at home and time at home without external AF-related care. Results: After matching, a total of 100, 977 apixaban-warfarin, 36, 990 dabigatran-warfarin, and 125, 068 rivaroxaban-warfarin patient pairs were selected. Of those patients, 38–46% had 180 days of follow-up available. Across treatment cohorts, approximately 75% of patients were at home for the 180-day follow-up. Apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban patients had 1.3, 0.9, and 0.8 more days at home, respectively, compared to warfarin patients. Patients treated with apixaban had 13.4 more days at home without AF-related care compared to warfarin, while dabigatran and rivaroxaban had 11.6 and 11.7 more days at home without AF-related care compared to warfarin. A greater proportion of warfarin patients than NOAC patients had an INR test (81–82% vs 14–21%), and days with INR testing were the main driver for external AF-related care for warfarin patients. Conclusion: Among NVAF patients treated with OACs, NOACs were associated with a longer time at home and time at home without external AF-related care compared to warfarin. These results can help inform healthcare providers and patients regarding the impact of NOAC treatment in NVAF patients. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.