The short-term impact of analyst recommendations: evidence from the Indian stock market. Issue 1 (30th June 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The short-term impact of analyst recommendations: evidence from the Indian stock market. Issue 1 (30th June 2021)
- Main Title:
- The short-term impact of analyst recommendations: evidence from the Indian stock market
- Authors:
- Sharda, Shreya
- Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the short-term impact of brokerage analysts' recommendations on abnormal returns using a sample selected from the S&P BSE 100 in the Indian context. The efficient market hypothesis, specifically, its semi-strong form, is tested for "Buy" stock recommendations published in the electronic version of Business Standard. The crucial issue is, are there any abnormal returns that can be earned following a recommendation? If so, how quickly do prices incorporate the information value of these recommendations? It tests the impact of analyst recommendations on average abnormal returns (AARs) and standardized abnormal returns (SRs) to determine their statistical significance. Design/methodology/approach: Using a sample of stock recommendations published in the e-version of Business Standard, the event study methodology is used to determine whether AARs and SRs are significantly different from zero for the duration of the event window by using several significance tests. Findings: The findings indicate a marginal opportunity for profit in the short term, restricted to the event day. However, the effect does not persist, i.e. the market is efficient in its semi-strong form implying that investors cannot consistently earn abnormal returns by following analysts' recommendations. Post the event date, the market reaction to analyst recommendations becomes positive, however, insignificant until the ninth day after the recommendation providingAbstract : Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the short-term impact of brokerage analysts' recommendations on abnormal returns using a sample selected from the S&P BSE 100 in the Indian context. The efficient market hypothesis, specifically, its semi-strong form, is tested for "Buy" stock recommendations published in the electronic version of Business Standard. The crucial issue is, are there any abnormal returns that can be earned following a recommendation? If so, how quickly do prices incorporate the information value of these recommendations? It tests the impact of analyst recommendations on average abnormal returns (AARs) and standardized abnormal returns (SRs) to determine their statistical significance. Design/methodology/approach: Using a sample of stock recommendations published in the e-version of Business Standard, the event study methodology is used to determine whether AARs and SRs are significantly different from zero for the duration of the event window by using several significance tests. Findings: The findings indicate a marginal opportunity for profit in the short term, restricted to the event day. However, the effect does not persist, i.e. the market is efficient in its semi-strong form implying that investors cannot consistently earn abnormal returns by following analysts' recommendations. Post the event date, the market reaction to analyst recommendations becomes positive, however, insignificant until the ninth day after the recommendation providing support to the underreaction hypothesis given by Shliefer (2000) and post-recommendation price drift documented by Womack (1996). The study contributes by using different statistical tests to determine the significance of returns. Practical implications: There are important implications for traders, investors and portfolio managers. The speed with which market prices incorporate publicly available information is useful in formulating trading strategies. However, stock characteristics such as market capitalization, volatility and level of analyst coverage need to be incorporated while making investment decisions. Originality/value: The study contributes by using different statistical tests to determine the significance of returns. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Vilakshan. Volume 19:Issue 1(2022)
- Journal:
- Vilakshan
- Issue:
- Volume 19:Issue 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 19, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0019-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 2
- Page End:
- 19
- Publication Date:
- 2021-06-30
- Subjects:
- Analysts' recommendations -- Market efficiency -- Abnormal returns -- Event study
Management -- Periodicals
658.005 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/xjm ↗
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1108/XJM-12-2020-0239 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0973-1954
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25224.xml