Combined therapy of photobiomodulation and adipose-derived stem cells synergistically improve healing in an ischemic, infected and delayed healing wound model in rats with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Issue 1 (24th February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ebrahimpour-Malekshah, Roohollah; Amini, Abdollah; Zare, Fatemeh; Mostafavinia, Atarodsadat; Davoody, Samin; Deravi, Niloofar; Rahmanian, Mohammad; Hashemi, Seyed Mahmoud; Habibi, Malihe; Ghoreishi, Seyed Kamran; Chien, Sufan; Shafikhani, Sasha; Ahmadi, Houssein; Bayat, Sahar; Bayat, Mohammad
• Is Part Of: BMJ open diabetes research and care. Volume 8:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-02-24
• Subjects: wound healing; Diabetes -- Periodicals; 616.462005
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001033
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2052-4897

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: We assessed the therapeutic effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) and adipose-derived stem cell (ADS) treatments individually and together on the maturation step of repairing of a delayed healing wound model in rats with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). Research design and methods: We randomly assigned 24 rats with DM1 to four groups (n=6 per group). Group 1 was the control (placebo) group. In group 2, allograft human ADSs were transplanted. Group 3 was subjected to PBM (wavelength: 890 nm, peak power output: 80 W, pulse frequency: 80 Hz, pulsed duration: 180 ns, duration of exposure for each point: 200 s, power density: 0.001 W/cm 2, energy density: 0.2 J/cm 2 ) immediately after surgery, which continued for 6 days per week for 16 days. Group 4 received both the human ADS and PBM. In addition, we inflicted an ischemic, delayed healing, and infected wound simulation in all of the rats. The wounds were infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Results: All three treatment regimens significantly decreased the amount of microbial flora, significantly increased wound strength and significantly modulated inflammatory response and significantly increased angiogenesis on day 16. Microbiological analysis showed that PBM+ADS was significantly better than PBM and ADS alone. In terms of wound closure rate and angiogenesis, PBM+ADS was significantly better than the PBM, ADS and control groups. Conclusions: Combination therapy of PBM+ADS is more effective that either PBM or ADS in stimulating skin injury repair, and modulating inflammatory response in an MRSA-infected wound model of rats with DM1.