Unraveling Additive from Nonadditive Effects Using Genomic Relationship Matrices. Issue 4 (15th October 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Muñoz, Patricio R; Resende, Marcio F R; Gezan, Salvador A; Resende, Marcos Deon Vilela; de los Campos, Gustavo; Kirst, Matias; Huber, Dudley; Peter, Gary F
• Is Part Of: Genetics. Volume 198:Issue 4(2014)
• Page Start: 1759
• Page End: 1768
• Publication Date: 2014-10-15
• Subjects: Genomic selection -- G-BLUP -- nonadditive -- realized relationship matrices -- dominance relationship matrix -- GenPred -- shared data resource; Genetics -- Periodicals; 576.5
• DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.171322
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-6731

Abstract

Abstract: The application of quantitative genetics in plant and animal breeding has largely focused on additive models, which may also capture dominance and epistatic effects. Partitioning genetic variance into its additive and nonadditive components using pedigree-based models (P-genomic best linear unbiased predictor) (P-BLUP) is difficult with most commonly available family structures. However, the availability of dense panels of molecular markers makes possible the use of additive- and dominance-realized genomic relationships for the estimation of variance components and the prediction of genetic values (G-BLUP). We evaluated height data from a multifamily population of the tree species Pinus taeda with a systematic series of models accounting for additive, dominance, and first-order epistatic interactions (additive by additive, dominance by dominance, and additive by dominance), using either pedigree- or marker-based information. We show that, compared with the pedigree, use of realized genomic relationships in marker-based models yields a substantially more precise separation of additive and nonadditive components of genetic variance. We conclude that the marker-based relationship matrices in a model including additive and nonadditive effects performed better, improving breeding value prediction. Moreover, our results suggest that, for tree height in this population, the additive and nonadditive components of genetic variance are similar in magnitude. This novel result improves our current understanding of the genetic control and architecture of a quantitative trait and should be considered when developing breeding strategies.