Challenges in Species Tree Estimation Under the Multispecies Coalescent Model. Issue 4 (1st December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xu, Bo; Yang, Ziheng
• Is Part Of: Genetics. Volume 204:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 1353
• Page End: 1368
• Publication Date: 2016-12-01
• Subjects: anomaly zone -- BPP -- concatenation -- gene trees -- incomplete lineage sorting -- maximum likelihood -- multispecies coalescent -- species trees; Genetics -- Periodicals; 576.5
• DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.190173
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-6731

Abstract

Abstract: The multispecies coalescent (MSC) model has emerged as a powerful framework for inferring species phylogenies while accounting for ancestral polymorphism and gene tree-species tree conflict. A number of methods have been developed in the past few years to estimate the species tree under the MSC. The full likelihood methods (including maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference) average over the unknown gene trees and accommodate their uncertainties properly but involve intensive computation. The approximate or summary coalescent methods are computationally fast and are applicable to genomic datasets with thousands of loci, but do not make an efficient use of information in the multilocus data. Most of them take the two-step approach of reconstructing the gene trees for multiple loci by phylogenetic methods and then treating the estimated gene trees as observed data, without accounting for their uncertainties appropriately. In this article we review the statistical nature of the species tree estimation problem under the MSC, and explore the conceptual issues and challenges of species tree estimation by focusing mainly on simple cases of three or four closely related species. We use mathematical analysis and computer simulation to demonstrate that large differences in statistical performance may exist between the two classes of methods. We illustrate that several counterintuitive behaviors may occur with the summary methods but they are due to inefficient use of information in the data by summary methods and vanish when the data are analyzed using full-likelihood methods. These include (i) unidentifiability of parameters in the model, (ii) inconsistency in the so-called anomaly zone, (iii) singularity on the likelihood surface, and (iv) deterioration of performance upon addition of more data. We discuss the challenges and strategies of species tree inference for distantly related species when the molecular clock is violated, and highlight the need for improving the computational efficiency and model realism of the likelihood methods as well as the statistical efficiency of the summary methods.