Neurobiology of Female Mate Choice in Frogs: Auditory Filtering and Valuation. (26th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Burmeister, Sabrina S.
• Is Part Of: Integrative and comparative biology. Volume 57:Number 4(2017:Oct.)
• Page Start: 857
• Page End: 864
• Publication Date: 2017-09-26
• Subjects: Zoology -- Periodicals; Biology -- Periodicals; Physiology, Comparative -- Periodicals; 590.5
• DOI: 10.1093/icb/icx098
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1540-7063

Abstract

Synopsis: Mate choice is a decision making process with profound implication for the reproductive success of both the sender and the chooser. Preferences for conspecific over heterospecific males and for some conspecifics over others are typically mediated by a female's response to signals produced by males. And although one can experimentally describe a female's preference function, there is relatively little understood about the neural mechanisms mediating these preferences. In anurans, mating preferences have often been explained in terms of sensory biases. Indeed, in the túngara frog ( Physalaemus pustulosus ), the auditory system appears to act as a filter for conspecific calls. However, auditory responses are not good predictors of intraspecific mating preferences in túngara frogs. Rather, neural activity in the preoptic area, which can be gated by estradiol, is a better predictor of mating preferences. A similar pattern holds in spadefoot toads ( Spea bombifrons ): the preoptic area, but not the auditory midbrain, integrates physiological cues in its response to mating calls in a pattern that predicts preferences. Neuroanatomically, the anuran preoptic area is poised to mediate forebrain influences on auditory response of the midbrain and it has descending projections to the medulla and spinal cord that could directly influence motor responses. Indeed, lesions of the preoptic area abolish phonotaxis. A role for the preoptic area in mating preferences is supported by studies in mammals that show the preoptic area is required for the expression of preferences. Further, activity of the preoptic area correlates with mating preference in fish. This leads to a model for the neurobiological mechanisms of mate choice, in which sensory systems filter relevant signals from irrelevant ones, but the preoptic area assigns value to the range of relevant signals.