Institutional acceptance of wildlife mitigation technologies for wind energy: The case of Israel. (February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cohen, Adi; Fischhendler, Itay; Katz, David
• Is Part Of: Energy policy. Volume 173(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-02
• Subjects: Wind power -- Birds -- Social acceptance -- Mitigation technology -- Renewable energy -- Uncertainty; Energy policy -- Periodicals; Politique énergétique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 333.79
• DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113359
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4215

Abstract

Abstract: While the existing literature on the acceptability of renewable energy focuses primarily on stated preferences of individual acceptance, this study focuses on a socio-political dimension of acceptance by examining revealed preferences as evidenced by stakeholder interactions with in a regulatory process. Specifically, we examine the acceptability of technology designed to mitigate harm to wildlife: a Shutdown On Demand (SOD) technology. Taking a longitudinal approach, we review planning protocols covering four years of negotiations over this new mitigating technology in the case of a proposed wind farm to be located along a major international corridor for migrating birds. We develop three separate indicators of institutional acceptance and demonstrate how exposure to different types of uncertainties influenced acceptance of the technology over time. We also show how various responses to these uncertainties can resolve gridlocks around institutional acceptance. The study offers insights into the development of negotiations strategies for different stakeholders over time. It also offers recommendations for policy designed to resolve issues inhibiting institutional acceptance, including data gathering and exchange, issue linkage strategies, and incremental regime building. Highlights: The study looks at views on technology to mitigate wildlife impacts of wind farms. It examines institutional acceptance rather than personal or community acceptance. It relies on revealed preferences, rather than stated preferences. Provides longitudinal perspective to see how acceptance evolves over time in Israel. We find that acceptance is dynamic and type and timing of interventions matters.