2060. Evaluation of the real world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance since adoption as guideline preferred therapy. (15th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Januszka, Jenna; Drwiega, Emily N; Drwiega, Emily N; Burgos, Rodrigo M; Michienzi, Sarah M; Smith, Renata; Badowski, Melissa E
• Is Part Of: Open forum infectious diseases. Volume 9:(2022)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2022-12-15
• Subjects: Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Medical microbiology -- Periodicals; Infection -- Periodicals; 616.9
• DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1682
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2328-8957

Abstract

Abstract: Background: There are limited data reporting real-world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance (INSTI-R) since the approval and first-line treatment recommendation of INSTIs in the US. A recent analysis of the national surveillance data estimated INSTI-R to be 6.3%. The purpose of this study was to describe real-world incidence of INSTI-R in patients who used an INSTI-based single tablet regimen (STR) in a major metropolitan area and identify risk factors for resistance. Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who were prescribed an INSTI-STR between September 2017 and September 2020 and followed for > 12 months at the University of Illinois Chicago Community Clinic Network (UCCN). The primary endpoint was the difference in INSTI-R in UCCN patients compared to the national prevalence of 6.3%. Other outcomes included development of virologic failure (VF), defined as 2 consecutive HIV-1 viral loads (VL) > 200 copies/mL after week 24, and documented INSTI-R mutations. Patient specific factors associated with medication nonadherence were also collected. All endpoints were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: Of 948 patients screened, 248 patients were included. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. VF occurred in 17 subjects (6.8%). Two of the 17 (11.8%) received subsequent INSTI-R testing and nine eventually virally suppressed without regimen changes (52.9%). Patients without VF were assumed to have no INSTI-R. No subjects developed INSTI-R, which was significantly less than the national prevalence of 6.3% (p=0.0029). Patients with a high VL at baseline were more likely to experience VF (p=0.001). The most common factors associated with nonadherence in patients with VF are summarized in Table 2. Conclusion: The true rate of INSTI-R in UCCN patients is still unknown and factors associated with developing INSTI-R were unable to be assessed. Among patients at UCCN on INSTI-based STRs, INSTI-R rates were lower than the national average. Future analyses should also include patients on INSTI-based non-STR regimens as increased pill burden is a known risk factor for nonadherence leading to VF and drug resistance. Disclosures: All Authors : No reported disclosures.