1784. Appropriateness of Intravenous Vancomycin in a Canadian Acute Care Hospital. (15th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Glassman, Heather; Ismail, Arif; Smith, Stephanie W; Stewart, Jackson J; Lau, Cecilia; Kabbani, Dima; Chen, Justin Z
• Is Part Of: Open forum infectious diseases. Volume 9:(2022)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2022-12-15
• Subjects: Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Medical microbiology -- Periodicals; Infection -- Periodicals; 616.9
• DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1414
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2328-8957

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Intravenous (IV) vancomycin is a commonly prescribed antimicrobial. However, there is limited literature assessing IV vancomycin appropriateness. The objective of the study was to assess the appropriateness of IV vancomycin prescriptions in a Canadian acute care hospital. Methods: Prospective audit and feedback (PAF) was conducted on all new IV vancomycin prescriptions in hospitalized adults (age ≥ 18 years) at the University of Alberta Hospital from January 17 to February 11, 2022. Appropriateness was assessed against institutional prescribing guidelines (Bugs & Drugs® and Alberta Health Services Formulary Prescribing Guidelines). Verbal and written feedback were provided to the attending teams. Results: A total of 109 prescriptions were audited. Median age was 57 (IQR 43-72) years and 42% were female. 65 (60%) were admitted to Medicine, 18 (17%) to Surgery, and 26 (24%) to Intensive Care units. MRSA colonization was present in 32 (29%) patients, β-lactam allergy recorded in 21 (19%), and acute kidney injury (AKI) in 21 (19%). Infectious Diseases consultation (IDC) occurred in 29 (27%). The top indications were skin and soft tissue, pulmonary, and bloodstream infections (Table 1); 70% of prescriptions were empiric in nature. Overall, 43 (39%) prescriptions were assessed to be suboptimal. Antimicrobial Stewardship program (ASP) recommendations were made in 56 prescriptions, totaling 63 unique recommendations. Vancomycin was recommended to be discontinued in 24 (43%) cases or changed to a different agent in 15 (27%). Regimen optimization (duration or frequency change) was recommended in 4 (7%). ASP recommended investigations in 8 cases and IDC in 12. Full or partial acceptance was achieved in 49 cases (88%). IDC was associated with greater appropriateness (83% vs 53%, p=0.004) as was MRSA colonization (75% vs 55%, p=0.047), but AKI was not (62% vs 60%, p=0.888). Adjusting for age, AKI, and MRSA colonization, IDC remained a significant predictor of vancomycin appropriateness (OR=4.27, [95%CI 1.44-12.70]; p=0.009). Conclusion: IV vancomycin prescriptions were suboptimal in 39% of cases. IDC was associated with increased appropriateness. This pilot informs the need for antimicrobial stewardship intervention and the importance of IDC at our center. Disclosures: Dima Kabbani, MD, MSc, AVIR Pharma: Grant/Research Support|AVIR Pharma: Honoraria|GSK: Honoraria|Merck: Grant/Research Support.