Evolution of the Yeast Recombination Landscape. (7th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liu, Haoxuan; Maclean, Calum J; Zhang, Jianzhi
• Editors: Takahashi, Aya
• Is Part Of: Molecular biology and evolution. Volume 36:Number 2(2019)
• Page Start: 412
• Page End: 422
• Publication Date: 2018-12-07
• Subjects: crossover -- double-strand break -- hotspot paradox -- recombination rate -- Saccharomyces cerevisiae -- Saccharomyces paradoxus; Molecular biology -- Periodicals; Molecular evolution -- Periodicals; Evolution, Molecular -- Periodicals; Molecular Biology -- Periodicals; 572.8
• DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy233
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0737-4038

Abstract

Abstract: Meiotic recombination comprises crossovers and noncrossovers. Recombination, crossover in particular, shuffles mutations and impacts both the level of genetic polymorphism and the speed of adaptation. In many species, the recombination rate varies across the genome with hot and cold spots. The hotspot paradox hypothesis asserts that recombination hotspots are evolutionarily unstable due to self-destruction. However, the genomic landscape of double-strand breaks (DSBs), which initiate recombination, is evolutionarily conserved among divergent yeast species, casting doubt on the hotspot paradox hypothesis. Nonetheless, because only a subset of DSBs are associated with crossovers, the evolutionary conservation of the crossover landscape could differ from that of DSBs. Here, we investigate this possibility by generating a high-resolution recombination map of the budding yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus through whole-genome sequencing of 50 meiotic tetrads and by comparing this recombination map with that of S. cerevisiae. We observe a 40% lower recombination rate in S. paradoxus than in S. cerevisiae . Compared with the DSB landscape, the crossover landscape is even more conserved. Further analyses indicate that the elevated conservation of the crossover landscape is explained by a near-subtelomeric crossover preference in both yeasts, which we find to be attributable at least in part to crossover interference. We conclude that the yeast crossover landscape is highly conserved and that the evolutionary conservation of this landscape can differ from that of the DSB landscape.