Clinical practice guideline for transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis in Latin America. Issue 18 (14th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lamelas, Pablo; Ragusa, Martin Alberto; Bagur, Rodrigo; Jaffer, Iqbal; Ribeiro, Henrique; Baranchuk, Adrian; Wyss, Fernando; Sosa Liprandi, Alvaro; Olivares, Gabriel; Arrais, Magaly; Rendon, Juan Camilo; Catrip, Jorge; Agatiello, Carla; Cura, Fernando; Marchena, Alfaro; Sandoli de Brito Jr, Fabio; Mangione, José A; Damonte, Aníbal; Santaera, Omar; Hidalgo, Pedro; Nieuwlaat, Robby; Izcovich, Ariel
• Is Part Of: Heart. Volume 107:Issue 18(2021)
• Page Start: 1450
• Page End: 1457
• Publication Date: 2021-06-14
• Subjects: transcatheter aortic valve replacement -- aortic valve stenosis -- heart valve prosthesis implantation; Heart -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319489
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-6037

Abstract

Abstract : In elderly (75 years or older) patients living in Latin America with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis candidates for transfemoral approach, the panel suggests the use of transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI) over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This is a conditional recommendation, based on moderate certainty in the evidence (⨁⨁⨁Ο). This recommendation does not apply to patients in which there is a standard of care, like TAVI for patients at very high risk for cardiac surgery or inoperable patients, or SAVR for non-elderly patients (eg, under 65 years old) at low risk for cardiac surgery. The suggested age threshold of 75 years old is based on judgement of limited available literature and should be used as a guide rather than a determinant threshold. The conditional nature of this recommendation means that the majority of patients in this situation would want a transfemoral TAVI over SAVR, but some may prefer SAVR. For clinicians, this means that they must be familiar with the evidence supporting this recommendation and help each patient to arrive at a management decision integrating a multidisciplinary team discussion (Heart Team), patient's values and preferences through shared decision-making, and available resources. Policymakers will require substantial debate and the involvement of various stakeholders to implement this recommendation.