Effectiveness of two coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines (viral vector and inactivated viral vaccine) against severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in a cohort of healthcare workers. (30th March 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effectiveness of two coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines (viral vector and inactivated viral vaccine) against severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in a cohort of healthcare workers. (30th March 2022)
- Main Title:
- Effectiveness of two coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines (viral vector and inactivated viral vaccine) against severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in a cohort of healthcare workers
- Authors:
- Marra, Alexandre R.
Miraglia, João Luiz
Malheiros, Daniel Tavares
Guozhang, Yang
Teich, Vanessa Damazio
da Silva Victor, Elivane
Pinho, João Renato Rebello
Cypriano, Adriana
Vieira, Laura Wanderly
Polonio, Miria
Ornelas, Rafael Herrera
de Oliveira, Solange Miranda
Borges Junior, Flavio Araujo
Shibata, Audrey Rie Ogawa
Schettino, Guilherme de Paula Pinto
de Oliveira, Ketti Gleyzer
Ferraz Santana, Rúbia Anita
de Mello Malta, Fernanda
Amgarten, Deyvid
Boechat, Ana Laura
Trecenti, Noelly Maria Zimpel
Kobayashi, Takaaki
Salinas, Jorge L.
Edmond, Michael B.
Rizzo, Luiz Vicente - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: We investigated real-world vaccine effectiveness for Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1) and CoronaVac against laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among HCWs (aged ≥18 years) working in a private healthcare system in Brazil between January 1, 2021 and August 3, 2021, to assess vaccine effectiveness. We calculated vaccine effectiveness as 1 − rate ratio (RR), with RR determined by adjusting Poisson models with the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection as the outcome and the vaccination status as the main variable. We used the logarithmic link function and simple models adjusting for sex, age, and job types. Results: In total, 13, 813 HCWs met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. Among them, 6, 385 (46.2%) received the CoronaVac vaccine, 5, 916 (42.8%) received the ChAdOx1 vaccine, and 1, 512 (11.0%) were not vaccinated. Overall, COVID-19 occurred in 6% of unvaccinated HCWs, 3% of HCWs who received 2 doses of CoronaVac vaccine, and 0.7% of HCWs who received 2 doses of ChAdOx1 vaccine ( P < .001). In the adjusted analyses, the estimated vaccine effectiveness rates were 51.3% for CoronaVac, and 88.1% for ChAdOx1 vaccine. Both vaccines reduced the number of hospitalizations, the length of hospital stay, and the need for mechanical ventilation. In addition, 19 SARS-CoV-2 samples from 19 HCWs were screened for mutations ofAbstract: Objective: We investigated real-world vaccine effectiveness for Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1) and CoronaVac against laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among HCWs (aged ≥18 years) working in a private healthcare system in Brazil between January 1, 2021 and August 3, 2021, to assess vaccine effectiveness. We calculated vaccine effectiveness as 1 − rate ratio (RR), with RR determined by adjusting Poisson models with the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection as the outcome and the vaccination status as the main variable. We used the logarithmic link function and simple models adjusting for sex, age, and job types. Results: In total, 13, 813 HCWs met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. Among them, 6, 385 (46.2%) received the CoronaVac vaccine, 5, 916 (42.8%) received the ChAdOx1 vaccine, and 1, 512 (11.0%) were not vaccinated. Overall, COVID-19 occurred in 6% of unvaccinated HCWs, 3% of HCWs who received 2 doses of CoronaVac vaccine, and 0.7% of HCWs who received 2 doses of ChAdOx1 vaccine ( P < .001). In the adjusted analyses, the estimated vaccine effectiveness rates were 51.3% for CoronaVac, and 88.1% for ChAdOx1 vaccine. Both vaccines reduced the number of hospitalizations, the length of hospital stay, and the need for mechanical ventilation. In addition, 19 SARS-CoV-2 samples from 19 HCWs were screened for mutations of interest. Of 19 samples, 18 were the γ (gamma) variant. Conclusions: Although both COVID-19 vaccines (viral vector and inactivated virus) can significantly prevent COVID-19 among HCWs, CoronaVac was much less effective. The COVID-19 vaccines were also effective against the dominant γ variant. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Infection control and hospital epidemiology. Volume 44:Number 1(2023)
- Journal:
- Infection control and hospital epidemiology
- Issue:
- Volume 44:Number 1(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 44, Issue 1 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0044-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 75
- Page End:
- 81
- Publication Date:
- 2022-03-30
- Subjects:
- Nosocomial infections -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Health facilities -- Sanitation -- Periodicals
Hospital buildings -- Sanitation -- Periodicals
Cross Infection -- Periodicals
Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Hospitals -- Periodicals
Infection Control -- Periodicals
614.44 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00004848-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ICE ↗
http://www.ichejournal.com/default.asp ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ICHE/home.html ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/0899823X.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1017/ice.2022.50 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0899-823X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library STI - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 25174.xml