Cranial anatomy of the mekosuchine crocodylian Trilophosuchus rackhami Willis, 1993. Issue 2 (29th August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ristevski, Jorgo; Weisbecker, Vera; Scanlon, John D.; Price, Gilbert J.; Salisbury, Steven W.
• Is Part Of: Anatomical record. Volume 306:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 239
• Page End: 297
• Publication Date: 2022-08-29
• Subjects: Crocodylia -- Longirostres -- Mekosuchinae -- Mekosuchini -- Trilophosuchus; Anatomy -- Periodicals; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; Morphology -- Periodicals; 571.3
• DOI: 10.1002/ar.25050
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1932-8486

Abstract

Abstract: One of the best‐preserved crocodylian fossil specimens from the Cenozoic of Australia is the holotype of the mekosuchine Trilophosuchus rackhami, from the middle Miocene (13.56 ± 0.67 Ma) Ringtail Site at Riversleigh, northwestern Queensland. Although lacking most of the snout, the holotype skull of T. rackhami (QMF16856) has an exceptionally well‐preserved cranium. Micro‐CT scanning of the holotype has allowed for all the preserved cranial bones to be digitally disarticulated, facilitating an unprecedented insight into the cranial anatomy of not just T. rackhami, but any mekosuchine. Trilophosuchus rackhami was a small‐bodied crocodylian and one of the most morphologically distinct mekosuchines, characterized by a unique combination of cranial characteristics several of which are exclusive to the species. Fossil material that is definitively referrable to the species T. rackhami is currently known solely from the middle Miocene Ringtail Site. However, an isolated parietal from Hiatus Site at Riversleigh demonstrates that Trilophosuchus also occurred during the late Oligocene (~25 Ma), extending the range of the genus by more than 10 million years. The new description of T. rackhami also allowed for a reevaluation of its phylogenetic relationships. Our results reaffirm the placement of T. rackhami as a member of Mekosuchinae within the subclade Mekosuchini. In all analyses, Mekosuchinae was consistently found to be monophyletic and part of the larger crocodylian clade Longirostres. However, the assignment of Mekosuchinae as a subset of Crocodylidae is brought into question, suggesting that the status of Mekosuchinae as a subfamily should be reconsidered.