The Utility of In‐Office Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Parotid Lesions. (24th January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Haidar, Yarah M.; Moshtaghi, Omid; Mahmoodi, Amin; Helmy, Mohammad; Goddard, Julie A.; Armstrong, William B.
• Is Part Of: Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery. Volume 156:Number 3(2017)
• Page Start: 511
• Page End: 517
• Publication Date: 2017-01-24
• Subjects: parotid -- ultrasound -- in‐office ultrasound -- otolaryngology; Head -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Neck -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; 617.51
• DOI: 10.1177/0194599816687744
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0194-5998

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To determine whether the use of in‐office ultrasound (US) by a head and neck surgeon is a useful adjunct to clinical assessment of parotid lesions and decrease the need of additional imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). Study Design: Case series with chart review. Setting: Tertiary care academic center. Subjects: Seventy patients presenting with a parotid lesion who obtained an in‐office US and ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (USGFNA) from a head and neck surgeon from 2006 to 2015. Methods: US images were retrospectively reviewed for 70 patients and characterized by a radiologist and a head and neck surgeon. Results: Of the 70 patients, 6 had US characteristics that demonstrated a statistically significant association with a benign/malignant diagnosis: depth from surface; irregular borders; presence of calcifications, which included either micro‐ or macro‐calcifications; posterior echogenicity enhancement; irregular shape; and homogeneous/heterogeneous echotexture. Imaging was performed prior to referral in 25 cases (35.7%); of those, 17 (68%) were for superficial, small (<2 cm) tumors where prereferral imaging studies did not provide additional information to that obtained with US. Of the 55 patients without MRI or CT performed prior to referral, MRI or positron emission tomography–CT scan was obtained in only 4 patients (7.3%) in cases involving recurrent parotid lesions, large tumors, or workup of a malignant neoplasm. Conclusions: Several US characteristics individually assist in lesion characterization. In‐office US and USGFNA are an appropriate first‐line modality in the assessment of parotid lesions, can allow for immediate parotid lesion assessment, and can decrease the need for additional imaging.