Peripartum women's perspectives on research study participation in the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium during COVID-19 pandemic. Issue 1 (10th October 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xu, Ke; Hsiao, Chu J.; Ballard, Hailey; Chachad, Nisha; Reeder, Callie F.; Shenkman, Elizabeth A.; Flood-Grady, Elizabeth; Louis-Jacques, Adetola F.; Smith, Erica L.; Thompson, Lindsay A.; Krieger, Janice; Francois, Magda; Lemas, Dominick J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical and translational science. Volume 7:Issue 1(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-10-10
• Subjects: Clinical research recruitment -- pregnancy -- breastfeeding -- barriers -- research participation; Clinical medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; Medicine, Experimental -- Periodicals; Human experimentation in medicine -- Periodicals; 616.027
• DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.476
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2059-8661

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented need for population-level clinical trials focused on the discovery of life-saving therapies and treatments. However, there is limited information on perception of research participation among perinatal populations, a population of particular interest during the pandemic. Methods: Eligible respondents were 18 years or older, were currently pregnant or had an infant (≤12 months old), and lived in Florida within 50 miles of sites participating in the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. Respondents were recruited via Qualtrics panels between April and September 2020. Respondents completed survey items about barriers and facilitators to participation and answered sociodemographic questions. Results: Of 533 respondents, most were between 25 and 34 years of age ( n = 259, 49%) and identified as White ( n = 303, 47%) and non-Hispanic ( n = 344, 65%). Facebook was the most popular social media platform among our respondents. The most common barriers to research participation included poor explanation of study goals, discomforts to the infant, and time commitment. Recruitment through healthcare providers was perceived as the best way to learn about clinical research studies. When considering research participation, "myself" had the greatest influence, followed by familial ties. Noninvasive biological samples were highly acceptable. Hispanics had higher positive perspectives on willingness to participate in a randomized study ( p = 0.009). Education ( p = 0.007) had significant effects on willingness to release personal health information. Conclusion: When recruiting women during the pregnancy and postpartum periods for perinatal studies, investigators should consider protocols that account for common barriers and preferred study information sources. Social media-based recruitment is worthy of adoption.