Reekeekee- and roodoodooviruses, two different Microviridae clades constituted by the smallest DNA phages. Issue 1 (23rd December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Olo Ndela, Eric; Roux, Simon; Henke, Christian; Sczyrba, Alexander; Sime Ngando, Télesphore; Varsani, Arvind; Enault, François
• Is Part Of: Virus evolution. Volume 9:Issue 1(2023)
• Publication Date: 2022-12-23
• Subjects: virus -- smallest DNA phages -- microviridae -- gene overprinting -- gene calling; Viruses -- Evolution -- Periodicals; 579.2138
• DOI: 10.1093/ve/veac123
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2057-1577

Abstract

Abstract: Small circular single-stranded DNA viruses of the Microviridae family are both prevalent and diverse in all ecosystems. They usually harbor a genome between 4.3 and 6.3 kb, with a microvirus recently isolated from a marine Alphaproteobacteria being the smallest known genome of a DNA phage (4.248 kb). A subfamily, Amoyvirinae, has been proposed to classify this virus and other related small Alphaproteobacteria-infecting phages. Here, we report the discovery, in meta-omics data sets from various aquatic ecosystems, of sixteen complete microvirus genomes significantly smaller (2.991–3.692 kb) than known ones. Phylogenetic analysis reveals that these sixteen genomes represent two related, yet distinct and diverse, novel groups of microviruses— amoyviruses being their closest known relatives. We propose that these small microviruses are members of two tentatively named subfamilies Reekeekeevirinae and Roodoodoovirinae . As known microvirus genomes encode many overlapping and overprinted genes that are not identified by gene prediction software, we developed a new methodology to identify all genes based on protein conservation, amino acid composition, and selection pressure estimations. Surprisingly, only four to five genes could be identified per genome, with the number of overprinted genes lower than that in phiX174. These small genomes thus tend to have both a lower number of genes and a shorter length for each gene, leaving no place for variable gene regions that could harbor overprinted genes. Even more surprisingly, these two Microviridae groups had specific and different gene content, and major differences in their conserved protein sequences, highlighting that these two related groups of small genome microviruses use very different strategies to fulfill their lifecycle with such a small number of genes. The discovery of these genomes and the detailed prediction and annotation of their genome content expand our understanding of ssDNA phages in nature and are further evidence that these viruses have explored a wide range of possibilities during their long evolution.