Reoperation and Perioperative Complications After Surgical Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison Between Three Procedures. Issue 4 (15th February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nayak, Rusheel; Razzouk, Jacob; Ramos, Omar; Ruckle, David; Chiu, Anthony; Parel, Philip; Stoll, William T.; Patel, Shalin; Thakkar, Savyasachi; Danisa, Olumide A.
• Is Part Of: Spine. Volume 48:Issue 4(2023)
• Page Start: 261
• Page End: 269
• Publication Date: 2023-02-15
• Subjects: cervical radiculopathy -- anterior cervical discectomy and fusion -- cervical disk arthroplasty -- posterior cervical foraminotomy -- perioperative complication rates; Spine -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals; Spine -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Spine -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.73005
• DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004506
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0362-2436

Abstract

Abstract : Study Design: A retrospective database study. Objective: The purpose of our study was to compare the perioperative complications and reoperation rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA), and posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) in patients treated for cervical radiculopathy. Summary of Background Data: Cervical radiculopathy results from compression or irritation of nerve roots in the cervical spine. While most cervical radiculopathy is treated nonoperatively, ACDF, CDA, and PCF are the techniques most commonly used if operative intervention is indicated. There is limited research evaluating the perioperative complications of these surgical techniques. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed using the PearlDiver Patient Record Database to identify cases of cervical radiculopathy that underwent ACDF, CDA, or PCF at one or two levels from 2007 to 2016. Perioperative complications and reoperations following each of the procedures were assessed. Results: During the study period, 25, 051 patients underwent ACDF, 522 underwent CDA, and 3986 underwent PCF. After propensity score matching, each of the three groups consisted of 507 patients. Surgical site infection rates were highest after PCF (2.17%) compared with ACDF (0.20%) and CDA (0.59%) at 30 days and three months ( P =0.003, P <0.001), respectively. New-onset cervicalgia was highest following ACDF (34.32%) and lowest after PCF (22.88%) at three and six months ( P <0.001 and P =0.003), respectively. Revision surgeries were highest among those who underwent CDA (6.90%) versus ACDF (3.16%) and PCF (3.55%) at six months ( P =0.007). Limb paralysis was significantly higher after PCF compared with CDA and ACDF at six months ( P <0.017). Conclusions: The rate of surgical site infection was higher in PCF compared with ACDF and CDA. New-onset cervicalgia was higher after ACDF compared with PCF and CDA at short-term follow-up. Revision surgeries were highest among those undergoing CDA and lowest in those undergoing ACDF. Level of Evidence: 3.