The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study. Issue 1 (February 2023)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study. Issue 1 (February 2023)
- Main Title:
- The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study
- Authors:
- van den Berg, Lauri M.M.
Balaam, Marie-Clare
Nowland, Rebecca
Moncrieff, Gill
Topalidou, Anastasia
Thompson, Suzanne
Thomson, Gill
de Jonge, Ank
Downe, Soo
Downe, Soo
Ellison, George
Fenton, Alan
Heazell, Alexander
de Jonge, Ank
Kingdon, Carol
Matthews, Zoe
Severns, Alexandra
Thomson, Gill
Topalidou, Anastasia
Wright, Alison
Akooji, Naseerah
Balaam, Marie-Clare
Cull, Jo
van den Berg, Lauri
Crossland, Nicola
Feeley, Claire
Franso, Beata
Heys, Steph
Moncrieff, Gill
Nowland, Rebecca
Sarian, Arni
Booker, Maria
Sandall, Jane
Thornton, Jim
Lynskey-Wilkie, Tisian
Wilson, Vanessa
Abe, Rebecca
Awe, Tinuke
Adeyinka, Toyin
Bender-Atik, Ruth
Brigante, Lia
Brione, Rebecca
Cadée, Franka
Duff, Elizabeth
Draycott, Tim
Fisher, Duncan
Francis, Annie
Franx, Arie
Erasmus, M.C.
Frith, Lucy
Griew, Louise
Harmer, Clea
Homer, Caroline
Knight, Marian
Mansfield, Amanda
Marlow, Neil
Mcaree, Trixie
Monteith, David
Reed, Keith
Richens, Yana
Rocca-Ihenacho, Lucia
Ross-Davie, Mary
Talbot, Seana
Taylor, Myles
Treadwell, Maureen
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises. Aim: To compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations. Method: A multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders. Findings: Both countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions, especially for families in vulnerable situations. Differences included care providers' fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which community- and personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised. Conclusion: We recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, andAbstract: Background: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises. Aim: To compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations. Method: A multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders. Findings: Both countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions, especially for families in vulnerable situations. Differences included care providers' fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which community- and personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised. Conclusion: We recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protection of staff wellbeing 2) integrate women's and families' values into the maternity and neonatal care system, ensuring equitable inclusion of the most vulnerable and 3) strengthen community provision to ensure system wide resilience to future shocks from pandemics, or other unexpected large-scale events. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Women and birth. Volume 36:Issue 1(2023)
- Journal:
- Women and birth
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Issue 1(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 1 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0036-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 127
- Page End:
- 135
- Publication Date:
- 2023-02
- Subjects:
- COVID-19 -- Maternal Health Services -- Newborn Care -- Infection Control -- United Kingdom -- Netherlands -- Policy Drivers
Midwives -- Periodicals
Pregnancy -- Periodicals
Midwifery -- Periodicals
Pregnancy -- Periodicals
618.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/18715192 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1871-5192
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9343.237300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25124.xml