Suspect Screening Using LC–QqTOF Is a Useful Tool for Detecting Drugs in Biological Samples. Issue 4 (4th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Colby, Jennifer M; Thoren, Katie L; Lynch, Kara L
• Is Part Of: Journal of analytical toxicology. Volume 42:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 207
• Page End: 213
• Publication Date: 2018-01-04
• Subjects: Drugs -- Analysis -- Periodicals; Drugs -- Toxicity testing -- Periodicals; 615.907
• DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkx107
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0146-4760

Abstract

Abstract: High-resolution mass spectrometers (HRMS), including quadrupole time of flight mass analyzers (QqTOF), are becoming more prevalent as screening tools in clinical and forensic toxicology laboratories. Among other advantages, HRMS instruments can collect untargeted, full-scan mass spectra. These datasets can be analyzed retrospectively using a combination of techniques, which can extend the drug detection capabilities. Most laboratories using HRMS in production settings perform untargeted data collection, but analyze data in a targeted manner. To perform targeted analysis, a laboratory must first analyze a reference standard to determine the expected characteristics of a given compound. In an alternate technique known as suspect screening, compounds can be tentatively identified without the use of reference standards. Instead, predicted and/or intrinsic characteristics of a compound, such as the accurate mass, isotope pattern, and product ion spectrum are used to determine its presence in a sample. The fact that reference standards are not required a priori makes this data analysis approach very attractive, especially for the ever-changing landscape of novel psychoactive substances. In this work, we compared the performance of four data analysis workflows (targeted and three suspect screens) for a panel of 170 drugs and metabolites, detected by LC–QqTOF. We found that retention time was not required for drug identification; the suspect screen using accurate mass, isotope pattern, and product ion library matching was able to identify more than 80% of the drugs that were present in human urine samples. We showed that the inclusion of product ion spectral matching produced the largest decrease in false discovery and false negative rates, as compared to suspect screening using mass alone or using just mass and isotope pattern. Our results demonstrate the promise that suspect screening holds for building large, economical drug screens, which may be a key tool to monitor the use of emerging drugs of abuse, including novel psychoactive substances.