The European model and the archive in Japan: Inspiration or legitimation?. (October 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mehl, Margaret
• Other Names: Huistra Pieter guest-editor.; Paul Herman guest-editor.; Tollebeek Jo guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: History of the human sciences. Volume 26:Number 4(2013)
• Page Start: 107
• Page End: 127
• Publication Date: 2013-10
• Subjects: archive -- cultural borrowing -- Historiographical Institute -- historiography -- Imperial University of Tokyo -- komonjogaku -- modern Japan; Social sciences -- History -- Periodicals; 300.9
• DOI: 10.1177/0952695113500292
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0952-6951

Abstract

The influence of European and especially German historiography on the formation of the modern academic discipline in Japan is undisputed, as is the importance of the German historian Ludwig Rieß. Undeniably, Rieß contributed to the organization of the academic discipline by teaching future historians and taking an active part in the establishment of the Historical Society, as well as by the example of his own research in the history of Japan. But how significant was his influence on the establishment and maintenance of archives in Japan? Japanese scholars had been collecting and working with primary documents long before Rieß arrived; indeed, the earliest efforts predate even the measures introduced under the Meiji government in the 1870s. This article outlines the beginnings of komonjogaku (the study of primary documents), giving particular attention to the work of its pioneer, Kume Kunitake. The author argues that while European methods based on archival research inspired and served to justify Japanese activities, indigenous traditions were at least equally important. Moreover, parallels with western countries are not merely a result of western imports but reflect the common responses to global processes in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.